Abstract
In this article, I will suggest standards for use in assessing a proposed codification. Although the standards I will identify are useful for evaluating a proposed codification of privilege law, they are also more generally applicable. Indeed, I will use them to examine the codification of evidence law in general. First, I will ask whether, as a normative matter, the law of evidence should be codified. I will then focus on the individual rules of evidence, most notably the privilege rules, to draw conclusions about whether those standards are met.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 809-860 |
| Number of pages | 52 |
| Journal | Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| State | Published - 2004 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A Legisprudential Analysis of Evidence Codification: Why Most Rules of Evidence Should Not Be Codified - But Privilege Law Should Be'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver