A multivariate perspective on lithic technological organization at Housepit 54, Bridge River Site (EeRl4), British Columbia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The management of lithic raw materials is a significant concern to anthropological archaeologists interested in hunter-gatherer socio-economies. A wide range of studies have implicated quarry distance, work needs, occupational longevity, and consumer population to variation in tactics for reduction, use, and maintenance of chipped stone tools. Fewer studies have examined socio-political factors in the organization of stone tool technology. This study examines the interactive effects of population, occupational longevity, favored prey, and socio-political complexity on the tactics by which lithic raw materials were managed in a long-lived winter pithouse in North America's interior Pacific Northwest. Results of bivariate and multivariate analyses implicate variability in toolstone economies as related to different classes of lithic items. Lithic cores and flake tools were more extensively reduced in contexts of productive subsistence economies, high populations, long winter occupations, and material wealth-based inequality. Bifaces were produced and maintained in relation to needs associated with intensity of deer hunting. The creation and maintenance of slate tools was affected at least in part by the intensity of salmon fishing. Combined, these data suggest that the organization of lithic tool technology responded to multiple factors across the lifespan of the house.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102562
JournalJournal of Archaeological Science: Reports
Volume33
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2020

Funding

The Bridge River Archaeological Project is a long-standing collaborative partnership between the University of Montana and Xwísten, the Bridge River Indian Band. We thank in particular, Susan James, Bradley Jack, and Gerald Michel for their significant roles in this project. The 2012-2016 field seasons at Housepit 54 were supported by two grants from the National Endowment for the Humanities (Grants RZ-51287-11 and RZ-230366-1 ). Any views, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this article do not necessarily represent those of the National Endowment for the Humanities. The 2008 field season at Bridge River that included initial excavations of Housepit 54 was funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation (grant BCS-0713013). We thank students and volunteers from the University of Montana, Simon Fraser University, Hamilton College, University of Michigan, and University of Notre Dame who participated in the Housepit 54 project. We thank two peer reviewers for their comments and the editors for moving the manuscript through the publication process. The Bridge River Archaeological Project is a long-standing collaborative partnership between the University of Montana and Xw?sten, the Bridge River Indian Band. We thank in particular, Susan James, Bradley Jack, and Gerald Michel for their significant roles in this project. The 2012-2016 field seasons at Housepit 54 were supported by two grants from the National Endowment for the Humanities (Grants RZ-51287-11 and RZ-230366-1). Any views, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this article do not necessarily represent those of the National Endowment for the Humanities. The 2008 field season at Bridge River that included initial excavations of Housepit 54 was funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation (grant BCS-0713013). We thank students and volunteers from the University of Montana, Simon Fraser University, Hamilton College, University of Michigan, and University of Notre Dame who participated in the Housepit 54 project. We thank two peer reviewers for their comments and the editors for moving the manuscript through the publication process. This work was supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities (Grants RZ-51287-11 and RZ-230366-1).

FundersFunder number
BCS-0713013
National Endowment for the HumanitiesRZ-51287-11, RZ-230366-1

    Keywords

    • Housepit villages
    • Hunter-gatherers
    • Lithic technological organization
    • Pacific Northwest

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A multivariate perspective on lithic technological organization at Housepit 54, Bridge River Site (EeRl4), British Columbia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this