A randomized-control trial testing the impact of a multidisciplinary team response to older adult maltreatment

Anne P. DePrince; Leslie K. Hasche; Julie M. Olomi; Naomi M. Wright; Jennifer Labus

doi:10.1080/08946566.2019.1682097

A randomized-control trial testing the impact of a multidisciplinary team response to older adult maltreatment

Anne P. DePrince
, Leslie K. Hasche
, Julie M. Olomi
, Naomi M. Wright
, Jennifer Labus

Psychology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Forensic center multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) have emerged to address older adult maltreatment; however, little research is available on this approach. The current study employed a randomized-control design to test the impact of a victim-focused, forensic center MDT relative to usual care (UC) on older adult victim and criminal justice outcomes. Cases of abuse, neglect, and/or financial exploitation involving a perpetrator in a position of trust were randomly assigned to MDT or UC. Outcomes were assessed via interviews with older adult victims, system-based advocates' surveys, and administrative data. According to system-based advocates, MDT had a better prognosis, higher across-agency coordination, and more types of engaged services relative to UC. Administrative data indicated low rates of APS case openings and prosecution. Findings provide support for continued use of MDTs following older adult maltreatment and highlight difficulties engaging older adults given the complex social and material circumstances often related to maltreatment.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	307-324
Number of pages	18
Journal	Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect
Volume	31
Issue number	4-5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/08946566.2019.1682097
State	Published - Oct 20 2019

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institute of Justice [Grant #2013-MU-CX-0032]. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or the official position of the National Institute of Justice or any other organization. We would like to thank the Denver Forensic Collaborative for their collaboration, particularly Maro Casparian (Denver District Attorney’s Office), Linda Loflin Pettit (Denver City Attorney’s Office), and Whitney Nettleton (Denver Adult Protective Services) as well as graduate students for their input, especially Tejas Srinivas and Kerry Gagnon. A description of these findings was included in a Summary Overview Report to the National Institute of Justice.

Funders	Funder number
Denver District Attorney’s Office
2013-MU-CX-0032

Keywords

Forensic center
elder abuse
multidisciplinary team
older adult abuse

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1080/08946566.2019.1682097

Cite this

@article{241b78e9027b40db943858cb932b8abd,

title = "A randomized-control trial testing the impact of a multidisciplinary team response to older adult maltreatment",

abstract = "Forensic center multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) have emerged to address older adult maltreatment; however, little research is available on this approach. The current study employed a randomized-control design to test the impact of a victim-focused, forensic center MDT relative to usual care (UC) on older adult victim and criminal justice outcomes. Cases of abuse, neglect, and/or financial exploitation involving a perpetrator in a position of trust were randomly assigned to MDT or UC. Outcomes were assessed via interviews with older adult victims, system-based advocates' surveys, and administrative data. According to system-based advocates, MDT had a better prognosis, higher across-agency coordination, and more types of engaged services relative to UC. Administrative data indicated low rates of APS case openings and prosecution. Findings provide support for continued use of MDTs following older adult maltreatment and highlight difficulties engaging older adults given the complex social and material circumstances often related to maltreatment.",

keywords = "Forensic center, elder abuse, multidisciplinary team, older adult abuse",

author = "DePrince, \{Anne P.\} and Hasche, \{Leslie K.\} and Olomi, \{Julie M.\} and Wright, \{Naomi M.\} and Jennifer Labus",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019, {\textcopyright} 2019 Taylor \& Francis.",

year = "2019",

month = oct,

day = "20",

doi = "10.1080/08946566.2019.1682097",

language = "English",

volume = "31",

pages = "307--324",

journal = "Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect",

issn = "0894-6566",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "4-5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A randomized-control trial testing the impact of a multidisciplinary team response to older adult maltreatment

AU - DePrince, Anne P.

AU - Hasche, Leslie K.

AU - Olomi, Julie M.

AU - Wright, Naomi M.

AU - Labus, Jennifer

PY - 2019/10/20

Y1 - 2019/10/20

N2 - Forensic center multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) have emerged to address older adult maltreatment; however, little research is available on this approach. The current study employed a randomized-control design to test the impact of a victim-focused, forensic center MDT relative to usual care (UC) on older adult victim and criminal justice outcomes. Cases of abuse, neglect, and/or financial exploitation involving a perpetrator in a position of trust were randomly assigned to MDT or UC. Outcomes were assessed via interviews with older adult victims, system-based advocates' surveys, and administrative data. According to system-based advocates, MDT had a better prognosis, higher across-agency coordination, and more types of engaged services relative to UC. Administrative data indicated low rates of APS case openings and prosecution. Findings provide support for continued use of MDTs following older adult maltreatment and highlight difficulties engaging older adults given the complex social and material circumstances often related to maltreatment.

AB - Forensic center multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) have emerged to address older adult maltreatment; however, little research is available on this approach. The current study employed a randomized-control design to test the impact of a victim-focused, forensic center MDT relative to usual care (UC) on older adult victim and criminal justice outcomes. Cases of abuse, neglect, and/or financial exploitation involving a perpetrator in a position of trust were randomly assigned to MDT or UC. Outcomes were assessed via interviews with older adult victims, system-based advocates' surveys, and administrative data. According to system-based advocates, MDT had a better prognosis, higher across-agency coordination, and more types of engaged services relative to UC. Administrative data indicated low rates of APS case openings and prosecution. Findings provide support for continued use of MDTs following older adult maltreatment and highlight difficulties engaging older adults given the complex social and material circumstances often related to maltreatment.

KW - Forensic center

KW - elder abuse

KW - multidisciplinary team

KW - older adult abuse

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85074535172

U2 - 10.1080/08946566.2019.1682097

DO - 10.1080/08946566.2019.1682097

M3 - Article

C2 - 31647382

AN - SCOPUS:85074535172

SN - 0894-6566

VL - 31

SP - 307

EP - 324

JO - Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect

JF - Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect

IS - 4-5

ER -

A randomized-control trial testing the impact of a multidisciplinary team response to older adult maltreatment

Abstract

Funding

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this