A roadmap for sampling and scaling biological nitrogen fixation in terrestrial ecosystems

  • Fiona M. Soper
  • , Benton N. Taylor
  • , Joy B. Winbourne
  • , Michelle Y. Wong
  • , Katherine A. Dynarski
  • , Carla R.G. Reis
  • , Mark B. Peoples
  • , Cory C. Cleveland
  • , Sasha C. Reed
  • , Duncan N.L. Menge
  • , Steven S. Perakis

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

44 Scopus citations

Abstract

Accurately quantifying rates and patterns of biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) in terrestrial ecosystems is essential to characterize ecological and biogeochemical interactions, identify mechanistic controls, improve BNF representation in conceptual and numerical modelling, and forecast nitrogen limitation constraints on future carbon (C) cycling. While many resources address the technical advantages and limitations of different methods for measuring BNF, less systematic consideration has been given to the broader decisions involved in planning studies, interpreting data, and extrapolating results. Here, we present a conceptual and practical road map to study design, study execution, data analysis and scaling, outlining key considerations at each step. We address issues including defining N-fixing niches of interest, identifying important sources of temporal and spatial heterogeneity, designing a sampling scheme (including method selection, measurement conditions, replication, and consideration of hotspots and hot moments), and approaches to analysing, scaling and reporting BNF. We also review the comparability of estimates derived using different approaches in the literature, and provide sample R code for simulating symbiotic BNF data frames and upscaling. Improving and standardizing study design at each of these stages will improve the accuracy and interpretability of data, define limits of extrapolation, and facilitate broader use of BNF data for downstream applications. We highlight aspects—such as quantifying scales of heterogeneity, statistical approaches for dealing with non-normality, and consideration of rates versus ecological significance—that are ripe for further development.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1122-1137
Number of pages16
JournalMethods in Ecology and Evolution
Volume12
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2021

Funding

This paper evolved from the ‘Novel multi‐scale synthesis of nitrogen fixation rates and drivers across the terrestrial biosphere’ working group supported by the USGS John Wesley Powell Center for Analysis and Synthesis. FMS, CCC and SR acknowledge support from a National Science Foundation RCN grant (DEB‐1754126). We thank Sian Kou‐Giesbrecht, Caroline Dallstream and Mia Marcellus for helpful comments. The authors report no conflict of interest. Any use of trade, firm or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. This paper evolved from the ‘Novel multi-scale synthesis of nitrogen fixation rates and drivers across the terrestrial biosphere’ working group supported by the USGS John Wesley Powell Center for Analysis and Synthesis. FMS, CCC and SR acknowledge support from a National Science Foundation RCN grant (DEB-1754126). We thank Sian Kou-Giesbrecht, Caroline Dallstream and Mia Marcellus for helpful comments. The authors report no conflict of interest. Any use of trade, firm or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Funder number
DEB‐1754126

    Keywords

    • asymbiotic
    • biological nitrogen fixation
    • free-living
    • nitrogen cycle
    • spatial variation
    • symbiotic
    • temporal variation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A roadmap for sampling and scaling biological nitrogen fixation in terrestrial ecosystems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this