Adapting western North American forests to climate change and wildfires: 10 common questions

Susan J. Prichard, Paul F. Hessburg, R. Keala Hagmann, Nicholas A. Povak, Solomon Z. Dobrowski, Matthew D. Hurteau, Van R. Kane, Robert E. Keane, Leda N. Kobziar, Crystal A. Kolden, Malcolm North, Sean A. Parks, Hugh D. Safford, Jens T. Stevens, Larissa L. Yocom, Derek J. Churchill, Robert W. Gray, David W. Huffman, Frank K. Lake, Pratima Khatri-Chhetri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

231 Scopus citations

Abstract

We review science-based adaptation strategies for western North American (wNA) forests that include restoring active fire regimes and fostering resilient structure and composition of forested landscapes. As part of the review, we address common questions associated with climate adaptation and realignment treatments that run counter to a broad consensus in the literature. These include the following: (1) Are the effects of fire exclusion overstated? If so, are treatments unwarranted and even counterproductive? (2) Is forest thinning alone sufficient to mitigate wildfire hazard? (3) Can forest thinning and prescribed burning solve the problem? (4) Should active forest management, including forest thinning, be concentrated in the wildland urban interface (WUI)? (5) Can wildfires on their own do the work of fuel treatments? (6) Is the primary objective of fuel reduction treatments to assist in future firefighting response and containment? (7) Do fuel treatments work under extreme fire weather? (8) Is the scale of the problem too great? Can we ever catch up? (9) Will planting more trees mitigate climate change in wNA forests? And (10) is post-fire management needed or even ecologically justified? Based on our review of the scientific evidence, a range of proactive management actions are justified and necessary to keep pace with changing climatic and wildfire regimes and declining forest heterogeneity after severe wildfires. Science-based adaptation options include the use of managed wildfire, prescribed burning, and coupled mechanical thinning and prescribed burning as is consistent with land management allocations and forest conditions. Although some current models of fire management in wNA are averse to short-term risks and uncertainties, the long-term environmental, social, and cultural consequences of wildfire management primarily grounded in fire suppression are well documented, highlighting an urgency to invest in intentional forest management and restoration of active fire regimes.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere02433
JournalEcological Applications
Volume31
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2021

Funding

This synthesis project was funded by the US Forest Service Pacific Northwest and Pacific Southwest Research Stations (P. F. Hessburg, N. A. Povak), California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (S. J. Prichard, R. K. Hagmann, P. Khatri-Chhetri); Ecological Restoration Institute (D. Huffman, R. K. Hagmann); Washington State Department of Natural Resources (D. Churchill, R. K. Hagmann); the Wilderness Society (R. K. Hagmann); Nature Conservancy–Oregon (R. K. Hagmann); and Conservation Northwest (R. K. Hagmann). We thank Mike Battaglia, Ellis Margolis, and James Rosen for their constructive reviews and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for assistance with publication. The authors also wish to acknowledge NSF’s Growing Convergence Research Program (Award Number 2019762) for support of this work. This paper was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and therefore it is in the public domain and not subject to copyright. This synthesis project was funded by the US Forest Service Pacific Northwest and Pacific Southwest Research Stations (P. F. Hessburg, N. A. Povak), California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (S. J. Prichard, R. K. Hagmann, P. Khatri‐Chhetri); Ecological Restoration Institute (D. Huffman, R. K. Hagmann); Washington State Department of Natural Resources (D. Churchill, R. K. Hagmann); the Wilderness Society (R. K. Hagmann); Nature Conservancy–Oregon (R. K. Hagmann); and Conservation Northwest (R. K. Hagmann). We thank Mike Battaglia, Ellis Margolis, and James Rosen for their constructive reviews and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for assistance with publication. The authors also wish to acknowledge NSF’s Growing Convergence Research Program (Award Number 2019762) for support of this work. This paper was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and therefore it is in the public domain and not subject to copyright.

FundersFunder number
Conservation Northwest
Washington State Department of Natural Resources
Wilderness Society
2019762

    Keywords

    • Climate Change and Western Wildfires
    • adaptive management
    • carbon
    • climate change
    • cultural burning
    • ecological resilience
    • forest management
    • fuel treatments
    • managed wildfire
    • mechanical thinning
    • prescribed fire
    • restoration
    • wildland fire

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Adapting western North American forests to climate change and wildfires: 10 common questions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this