TY - JOUR
T1 - Addendum to “Managing wolves (Canis lupus) to recover threatened woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) in Alberta”
AU - Hervieux, Dave
AU - Hebblewhite, Mark
AU - Stepnisky, Dave
AU - Bacon, Michelle
AU - Boutin, Stan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, NRC Research Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/1/28
Y1 - 2015/1/28
N2 - Managing predators to restore threatened or endangered species is often controversial. Hervieux et al. (2014, Can. J. Zool. 92(12): 1029–1037) report on the efficacy of wolf (Canis lupus L., 1758) reduction as a recovery strategy in the Little Smoky population of boreal woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou (Gmelin, 1788)) range in Alberta, which generated a lot of media attention. As such, the authors were invited by the journal editor who handled the original paper to write this addendum to provide clarification regarding the methodology used in the original paper. Wolf reduction was conducted by Government personnel in accordance with appropriate policy and laws (i.e., federal and provincial Species at Risk Acts, Alberta Wildlife Act, Alberta Woodland Caribou Policy). University-based researchers were involved only in data analysis and writing, and thus did not require approval by a university-based animal welfare board. Collaboration between independent university-based scientists and government biologists is essential to effective assessment of such controversial management practices. Hervieux et al. (2014, Can. J. Zool. 92(12): 1029–1037) in fact concluded that such wolf reductions, by themselves, would only “buy time” and would not restore woodland caribou alone without effective habitat protection.
AB - Managing predators to restore threatened or endangered species is often controversial. Hervieux et al. (2014, Can. J. Zool. 92(12): 1029–1037) report on the efficacy of wolf (Canis lupus L., 1758) reduction as a recovery strategy in the Little Smoky population of boreal woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou (Gmelin, 1788)) range in Alberta, which generated a lot of media attention. As such, the authors were invited by the journal editor who handled the original paper to write this addendum to provide clarification regarding the methodology used in the original paper. Wolf reduction was conducted by Government personnel in accordance with appropriate policy and laws (i.e., federal and provincial Species at Risk Acts, Alberta Wildlife Act, Alberta Woodland Caribou Policy). University-based researchers were involved only in data analysis and writing, and thus did not require approval by a university-based animal welfare board. Collaboration between independent university-based scientists and government biologists is essential to effective assessment of such controversial management practices. Hervieux et al. (2014, Can. J. Zool. 92(12): 1029–1037) in fact concluded that such wolf reductions, by themselves, would only “buy time” and would not restore woodland caribou alone without effective habitat protection.
KW - Canis lupus
KW - Caribou
KW - Endangered
KW - Rangifer tarandus caribou
KW - Recovery
KW - Species at Risk Acts
KW - Threatened
KW - Wolf
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924340848&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1139/cjz-2015-0012
DO - 10.1139/cjz-2015-0012
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84924340848
SN - 0008-4301
VL - 93
SP - 245
EP - 247
JO - Canadian Journal of Zoology
JF - Canadian Journal of Zoology
IS - 3
ER -