Agonists of the Nuclear Receptor PPARg Can Produce Biased Signaling

Biased signaling and ligand bias, often termed functional selectivity or selective nuclear receptor modulation, have been reported for nuclear receptor partial agonists over the past 20 years. Whether signaling differences produced by partial agonists result from less intense modulation, off-target effects, or biased signaling remains unclear. A commonly postulated mechanism for biased signaling is coactivator favoritism, where agonists induce different coactivator recruitment profiles. We find that both GW1929 (full agonist) and MRL24 (partial agonist) favor recruitment of 100 to 300 residue regions fromS-motif coactivators compared with a reference full agonist (rosiglitazone), yielding 95% bias value confidence intervals of 0.05-0.17 and 0.29-0.38, respectively. Calculations based on these data indicate that GW1929 and MRL24 would induce 30% to 60% higher S-motif coactivator occupancy at the receptor compared with rosiglitazone. We compare the transcriptional effects of these same three ligands on human adipocytes using RNA sequencing and exploratory Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis. Only 50% (rosiglitazone) and 77% (GW1929) of all gene expression changes are shared between these full agonists after 3 hours of exposure. After 24 hours of exposure, 13/98 KEGG pathways appear more intensely modulated by rosiglitazone than GW1929 (e.g., 95% confidence interval of bias in the regulation of lipolysis in adipocytes pathway is 0.03-0.09), despite similar signaling for the remaining 85 affected pathways. Similarly, rosiglitazone has an unusually large effect on several lipid metabolism-related pathways compared with the partial agonist MRL24. These data indicate that nuclear receptor full and partial agonists can induce biased signaling, likely through differences in coactivator recruitment.