Agricultural layering explains variation in sediment P dynamics in streams draining two distinct agricultural biomes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) enrichment of headwater agricultural streams due to the runoff of fertilizers can lead to the eutrophication of downstream aquatic ecosystems. Agriculture is intensive but heterogeneous in the Mississippi River Basin, with a mixture of pasture, row crops, and patches of confined animal feedlot operations (CAFOs). Many studies have evaluated how a single form of agricultural land use can affect sediment response to P loading, but few have considered the role of agricultural layering (i.e., one vs. two forms of agriculture in the same watershed). We used a synoptic sampling approach to determine the effect of agricultural layering on sediment P cycling in two watersheds in Arkansas (AR) and Michigan (MI). We sampled stream sediments from 10 sites in each watershed across two seasons; sampling from sites draining row crop vs. row crop plus a dairy in MI, and from sites draining chicken CAFOs vs. chicken CAFOs with pasture in AR. The proportion of bioavailable P was highest in MI and lowest in AR sediments, likely due to enhanced runoff of P rich sediment from row crops in MI, compared to sites in AR that were still predominantly forested, despite isolated CAFOs. Sediment P retention capacity was lowest downstream of sites with row crop + dairy in MI and highest at sites draining CAFOs alone in AR. Finally, substrate size differences between watersheds likely influences the reach-scale potential P retention capacity. Overall, we show that agricultural layering along with underlying geology can explain drivers influencing sediment P dynamics in agricultural streams.

Original languageEnglish
Article number7
JournalAquatic Sciences
Volume83
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2021

Funding

We acknowledge funding for fieldwork through grants from the Arkansas Water Resources Center (104B Program), and the Notre Dame Department of Biological Sciences. MTT was supported in part by a University of Notre Dame Center for Environmental Science and Technology (CEST) Predoctoral Fellowship. We also thank the private landowners for access to the field sites, and Erin Fuller and Colleen Forestieri with the Van Buren Conservation District, MI for assistance in securing permits. Finally, we thank the numerous members of the Tank and Entrekin Labs for their assistance in the field and with lab analyses. We acknowledge funding for fieldwork through grants from the Arkansas Water Resources Center (104B Program), and the Notre Dame Department of Biological Sciences. MTT was supported in part by a University of Notre Dame Center for Environmental Science and Technology (CEST) Predoctoral Fellowship. We also thank the private landowners for access to the field sites, and Erin Fuller and Colleen Forestieri with the Van Buren Conservation District, MI for assistance in securing permits. Finally, we thank the numerous members of the Tank and Entrekin Labs for their assistance in the field and with lab analyses.

    Keywords

    • Agriculture
    • CAFO
    • Phosphorus
    • Phosphorus sorption capacity
    • Stream sediments

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Agricultural layering explains variation in sediment P dynamics in streams draining two distinct agricultural biomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this