Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Article V, Section 12 of the Montana Constitution: Restoring Meaning to a Forgotten Provision

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

The Montana Supreme Court does not—and should not—hesitate to refuse to “march lock-step” with the United States Supreme Court, “even where the state constitutional provision at issue is nearly identical to its federal counterpart.” However, in interpreting Montana’s constitutional restriction on special legislation, the Court has done the opposite, applying a federal constitutional test to a state constitutional provision with no federal counterpart.

Article V, Section 12 of the Montana Constitution provides: Local and special legislation. The legislature shall not pass a special or local act when a general act is, or can be made, applicable.

Section 12 can and should serve the Legislature and the people as a unique and meaningful protection of the democratic process. This paper explores and advocates for a return to the meaning of Montana’s constitutional restriction on special legislation.
Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)115-144
JournalMontana Law Review
Volume79
Issue number1
StatePublished - Apr 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Article V, Section 12 of the Montana Constitution: Restoring Meaning to a Forgotten Provision'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this