Assessing global surface water inundation dynamics using combined satellite information from SMAP, AMSR2 and Landsat

  • Jinyang Du
  • , John S. Kimball
  • , John Galantowicz
  • , Seung Bum Kim
  • , Steven K. Chan
  • , Rolf Reichle
  • , Lucas A. Jones
  • , Jennifer D. Watts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

59 Scopus citations

Abstract

A method to assess global land surface water (fw) inundation dynamics was developed by exploiting the enhanced fw sensitivity of L-band (1.4 GHz) passive microwave observations from the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission. The L-band fw (fwLBand) retrievals were derived using SMAP H-polarization brightness temperature (Tb) observations and predefined L-band reference microwave emissivities for water and land endmembers. Potential soil moisture and vegetation contributions to the microwave signal were represented from overlapping higher frequency Tb observations from AMSR2. The resulting fwLBand global record has high temporal sampling (1–3 days) and 36-km spatial resolution. The fwLBand annual averages corresponded favorably (R = 0.85, p-value < 0.001) with a 250-m resolution static global water map (MOD44W) aggregated at the same spatial scale, while capturing significant inundation variations worldwide. The monthly fwLBand averages also showed seasonal inundation changes consistent with river discharge records within six major US river basins. An uncertainty analysis indicated generally reliable fwLBand performance for major land cover areas and under low to moderate vegetation cover, but with lower accuracy for detecting water bodies covered by dense vegetation. Finer resolution (30-m) fwLBand results were obtained for three sub-regions in North America using an empirical downscaling approach and ancillary global Water Occurrence Dataset (WOD) derived from the historical Landsat record. The resulting 30-m fwLBand retrievals showed favorable spatial accuracy for water (commission error 31.46%, omission error 30.20%) and land (commission error 0.87%, omission error 0.96%) classifications and seasonal wet and dry periods when compared to independent water maps derived from Landsat-8 imagery. The new fwLBand algorithms and continuing SMAP and AMSR2 operations provide for near real-time, multi-scale monitoring of global surface water inundation dynamics and potential flood risk.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-17
Number of pages17
JournalRemote Sensing of Environment
Volume213
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2018

Funding

SMAP brightness temperature data and land cover classification maps were provided courtesy of the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC), located in Boulder, CO. https://earthdata.nasa.gov/about/daacs/daac-nsidc . River discharge data are available from the U.S. Geological Survey; Landsat-8 OLI and TIRS data are distributed by the Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center (LP DAAC), located at USGS/EROS, Sioux Falls, SD. http://lpdaac.usgs.gov . The WBD is a coordinated effort between the United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS), the United States Geological Survey (USGS), and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The WBD was created from a variety of sources from each state and aggregated into a standard national layer for use in strategic planning and accountability. The SMOS data were obtained from the “Centre Aval de Traitement des Données SMOS” (CATDS), operated for the “Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales” (CNES, France) by IFREMER (Brest, France). This work was conducted at the University of Montana with funding from NASA ( NNX14AI50G , NNX15AB59G ). R. Reichle was supported by SMAP Science Team funding. Appendix A

FundersFunder number
National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNNX15AB59G, NNX14AI50G

    Keywords

    • AMSR2
    • Flood risk
    • Landsat
    • SMAP
    • Surface water inundation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing global surface water inundation dynamics using combined satellite information from SMAP, AMSR2 and Landsat'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this