Abstract
Recently developed methods, including time-to-event and space-to-event models, estimate the abundance of unmarked populations from encounter rates with camera trap arrays, addressing a gap in noninvasive wildlife monitoring. However, estimating abundance from encounter rates relies on assumptions that can be difficult to meet in the field, including random movement, population closure, and an accurate estimate of movement speed. Understanding how these models respond to violation of these assumptions will assist in making them more applicable in real-world settings. We used simulated walk models to test the effects of violating the assumptions of the time-to-event model under four scenarios: (1) incorrectly estimating movement speed, (2) violating closure, (3) individuals moving within simplified territories (i.e., movement restricted to partially overlapping circles), (4) and individuals clustering in preferred habitat. The time-to-event model was robust to closure violations, territoriality, and clustering when cameras were placed randomly. However, the model failed to estimate abundance accurately when movement speed was incorrectly estimated or cameras were placed nonrandomly with respect to habitat. We show that the time-to-event model can provide unbiased estimates of abundance when some assumptions that are commonly violated in wildlife studies are not met. Having a robust method for estimating the abundance of unmarked populations with remote cameras will allow practitioners to monitor a more diverse array of populations noninvasively. With the time-to-event model, placing cameras randomly with respect to animal movement and accurately estimating movement speed allows unbiased estimation of abundance. The model is robust to violating the other assumptions we tested.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e02388 |
| Journal | Ecological Applications |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2021 |
Funding
Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Funding and support for this project were provided by Idaho Department of Fish and Game, the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act, the Montana Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit, and the Wildlife Biology Program at the University of Montana. W. M. Joel helped us find our second wind whenever the simulations reminded us that we are only human. Two anonymous reviewers and Dr. Matthew Betts (Content Matter Editor) provided invaluable feedback they helped expand and improve this manuscript. All authors contributed to the conception and design of this project. KL coded the simulations and conducted the analysis. PL assisted with interpretation of the results. KL and HR wrote the paper. PL, DA, and MM provided critical revisions for the paper. All authors approved the final version to be published.
| Funders |
|---|
| Idaho Department of Fish and Game |
Keywords
- abundance
- camera trapping
- density
- estimation
- monitoring
- noninvasive
- remote camera
- sampling
- space-to-event
- time-to-event
- unmarked