Assessing treatment efficacy in the presence of diagnostic errors

Solomon Harrar, Anup Amatya, Leonid Kalachev

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations


This paper investigates estimating and testing treatment effects in randomized control trials where imperfect diagnostic device is used to assign subjects to treatment and control group(s). The paper focuses on pre-post design and proposes two new methods for estimating and testing treatment effects. Furthermore, methods for computing sample sizes for such design accounting for misclassification of the subjects are devised. The methods are compared with each other and with a traditional method that ignores the imperfection of the diagnostic device. In particular, the likelihood-based approach shows a significant advantage in terms of power, coverage probability and, consequently, in reduction of the required sample size. The application of the results are illustrated with data from an aging trial for dementia and data from electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings of alcoholic and non-alcoholic subjects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5338-5355
Number of pages18
JournalStatistics in Medicine
Issue number29
StatePublished - Dec 20 2016


  • diagnostic accuracy
  • expectation–maximization algorithm
  • mixture of normals
  • negative predictive value
  • positive predictive value
  • power
  • sample size


Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing treatment efficacy in the presence of diagnostic errors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this