Assessment of the SMAP Level-4 surface and root-zone soil moisture product using in situ measurements

  • Rolf H. Reichle
  • , Gabrielle J.M. De Lannoy
  • , Qing Liu
  • , Joseph V. Ardizzone
  • , Andreas Colliander
  • , Austin Conaty
  • , Wade Crow
  • , Thomas J. Jackson
  • , Lucas A. Jones
  • , John S. Kimball
  • , Randal D. Koster
  • , Sarith P. Mahanama
  • , Edmond B. Smith
  • , Aaron Berg
  • , Simone Bircher
  • , David Bosch
  • , Todd G. Caldwell
  • , Michael Cosh
  • , Ángel González-Zamora
  • , Chandra D.Holifield Collins
  • Karsten H. Jensen, Stan Livingston, Ernesto Lopez-Baeza, José Martínez-Fernández, Heather McNairn, Mahta Moghaddam, Anna Pacheco, Thierry Pellarin, John Prueger, Tracy Rowlandson, Mark Seyfried, Patrick Starks, Zhongbo Su, Marc Thibeault, Rogier van der Velde, Jeffrey Walker, Xiaoling Wu, Yijian Zeng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

251 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission Level-4 Surface and Root-Zone Soil Moisture (L4_SM) data product is generated by assimilating SMAP L-band brightness temperature observations into the NASA Catchment land surface model. The L4_SM product is available from 31 March 2015 to present (within 3 days from real time) and provides 3-hourly, global, 9-km resolution estimates of surface (0-5 cm) and root-zone (0-100 cm) soil moisture and land surface conditions. This study presents an overview of the L4_SM algorithm, validation approach, and product assessment versus in situ measurements. Core validation sites provide spatially averaged surface (root zone) soil moisture measurements for 43 (17) "reference pixels" at 9- and 36-km gridcell scales located in 17 (7) distinct watersheds. Sparse networks provide point-scale measurements of surface (root zone) soil moisture at 406 (311) locations. Core validation site results indicate that the L4_SM product meets its soil moisture accuracy requirement, specified as an unbiased RMSE (ubRMSE, or standard deviation of the error) of 0.04 m3 m-3 or better. The ubRMSE for L4_SM surface (root zone) soil moisture is 0.038 m3 m-3 (0.030 m3 m-3) at the 9-km scale and 0.035 m3 m-3 (0.026 m3 m-3) at the 36-km scale. The L4_SM estimates improve (significantly at the 5% level for surface soil moisture) over model-only estimates, which do not benefit from the assimilation of SMAP brightness temperature observations and have a 9-km surface (root zone) ubRMSE of 0.042 m3 m-3 (0.032 m3 m-3). Time series correlations exhibit similar relative performance. The sparse network results corroborate these findings over a greater variety of climate and land cover conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2621-2645
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Hydrometeorology
Volume18
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2017

Funding

Funding for this work was provided by the NASA SMAP mission. Computational resources were provided by the NASA High-End Computing program through the NASA Center for Climate Simulation. We are grateful for the datasets and data archiving centers that supported this work and appreciate those who make the generation, dissemination, and validation of the L4_SM product possible, including SMAP team members at JPL, GSFC, and NSIDC and staff at NOAA/CPC, NOAA/NCEI, USDA-ARS, USDA-NRCS, the Oklahoma Climatological Survey, and Monash University. Erica Tetlock is acknowledged for her help with the Kenaston network, for which funding was provided by the Canadian Space Agency and by Environment and Climate Change Canada.We thank three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

Funders
USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Oklahoma State University
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Canadian Space Agency
Monash University

    Keywords

    • Data assimilation
    • Kalman filters
    • Land surface model
    • Satellite observations
    • Soil moisture
    • Soil temperature

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of the SMAP Level-4 surface and root-zone soil moisture product using in situ measurements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this