Black-backed woodpecker abundance in the black hills

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Black Hills population of black-backed woodpeckers (Picoides arcticus) was petitioned, but deemed not warranted, to be listed as a threatened or endangered species under the Endangered Species Act and more information on their population size in the region is needed. Our objective was to map abundance and provide a population estimate of black-backed woodpeckers in the Black Hills and Bear Lodge Mountains of South Dakota and Wyoming, USA. We conducted 3,666 and 3,384 5-minute point count surveys from late-March to late-June in 2015 and 2016, respectively. We characterized vegetation around each point using geographic information system-derived landscape variables and fit 3-level hierarchical time-removal models in R package unmarked using gmultmix. The global abundance model received the most support and included year, latitude, and percent area of green trees, beetle-killed trees, dead trees, 1- to 2-year-old wildfire, 3-year-old wildfire, and 4- to 5-year-old wildfire. Points with high percent cover of beetle-killed trees had the greatest density of black-backed woodpeckers, followed by 1- to 2-year-old wildfires. After 4 years, areas burned by wildfire supported lower densities of black-backed woodpeckers than undisturbed forests. Mean density was 0.528 birds/km2 in 2015 and 0.626 birds/km2 in 2016. There were an estimated 2,920 and 3,439 black-backed woodpeckers in the Black Hills and Bear Lodge Mountains in 2015 and 2016, respectively. We suggest areas with high percent cover of beetle-killed trees may support high densities of black-backed woodpeckers and are important to sustaining populations when the availability of recent (<4 years old) wildfire is declining or scarce. Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1039-1048
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Wildlife Management
Volume82
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2018

Funding

We thank J. E. Guenther, J. L. Wilson, C. D. Yeager, J. T. Jacobs, L. R. McCullough, S. H. Freeman, Z. N. McDonald, and N. P. Meadows for their help with fieldwork. Major funding for this project was provided by U.S. Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station agreement 14-JV-11221632-104, Black Hills National Forest agreement ISA_0203-14-009, South Dakota Division of Agriculture, Division of Conservation and Forestry agreement 14-CO-11221532-090, South Dakota Department of Game Fish and Parks, Division of Wildlife agreement 14-CO- 11221632-151, and Wyoming Game and Fish Commission agreement 14-CO-11221632-144. This study was funded in part by federal funding through State Wildlife Grant T-65-R-1, Study 2476, administered through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and provided by the South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks.

FundersFunder number
Wildlife Resources Division14-CO- 11221632-151
Washington State Department of Fish and WildlifeT-65-R-1
14-CO-11221532-090, ISA_0203-14-009, 14-JV-11221632-104
Wyoming Game and Fish Commission14-CO-11221632-144

    Keywords

    • Black Hills
    • Picoides arcticus
    • abundance
    • black-backed woodpecker
    • point count
    • population estimate

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Black-backed woodpecker abundance in the black hills'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this