Abstract
Whether and how mutualisms are maintained through ecological and evolutionary time is a seldom studied aspect of bark beetle–fungal symbioses. All bark beetles are associated with fungi and some species have evolved structures for transporting their symbiotic partners. However, the fungal assemblages and specificity in these symbioses are not well known. To determine the distribution of fungi associated with the mycangia of the western pine beetle (Dendroctonus brevicomis), we collected beetles from across the insect’s geographic range including multiple genetically distinct populations. Two fungi, Entomocorticium sp. B and Ceratocystiopsis brevicomi, were isolated from the mycangia of beetles from all locations. Repeated sampling at two sites in Montana found that Entomocorticium sp. B was the most prevalent fungus throughout the beetle’s flight season, and that females carrying that fungus were on average larger than females carrying C. brevicomi. We present evidence that throughout the flight season, over broad geographic distances, and among genetically distinct populations of beetle, the western pine beetle is associated with the same two species of fungi. In addition, we provide evidence that one fungal species is associated with larger adult beetles and therefore might provide greater benefit during beetle development. The importance and maintenance of this bark beetle–fungus interaction is discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 859-870 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Microbial Ecology |
| Volume | 68 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 2014 |
Funding
This research would have been impossible without the beetle collections made by many USDA Forest Service personnel and university faculty. Their names are listed in Table . We would also like to thank Jiri Hulcr for collecting southern pine beetles and Tom Harrington for providing reference cultures. A special thanks to Joseph Dysthe, Monica Gokey, and Trevor Lasher for assistance in the lab. We are grateful to Jeffrey Good, John McCutcheon, Mike Schwartz, Ylva Lekberg, and two anonymous reviewers for comments provided on earlier drafts which greatly improved this manuscript. This research was funded by the McIntire-Stennis Cooperative Forestry Program and supported by the NSF EPSCoR Montana Institute on Ecosystems.