Brood size affects future reproduction in a long-lived bird with precocial young

  • Alan G. Leach
  • , James S. Sedinger
  • , Thomas V. Riecke
  • , Amanda W. Van Dellen
  • , David H. Ward
  • , W. Sean Boyd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Estimation of trade-offs between current reproduction and future survival and fecundity of long-lived vertebrates is essential to understanding factors that shape optimal reproductive investment. Black brant geese (Branta bernicla nigricans) fledge more goslings, on average, when their broods are experimentally enlarged to be greater than the most common clutch size of four eggs. Thus, we hypothesized that the lesser frequency of brant clutches exceeding four eggs results, at least partially, from a future reduction in survival, breeding probability, or clutch size for females tending larger broods. We used an 8-year markrecapture data set (Barker robust design) with 5 years of clutch and brood manipulations to estimate long-term consequences of reproductive decisions in brant. We did not find evidence of a trade-off between reproductive effort and true survival or future initiation date and clutch size. Rather, future breeding probability was maximized (0:92±0:03 [SE]) for manipulated females tending broods of four goslings and was lower for females tending smaller (one gosling; 0:63±0:09 [SE]) or larger (seven goslings; 0:52±0:15 [SE]) broods. Our results suggest that demographic trade-offs for female brant tending large broods may reduce the fitness value of clutches larger than four and, therefore, contribute to the paucity of larger clutches. The lack of a trade-off between reproductive effort and survival provides evidence that survival, to which fitness is most sensitive in long-lived animals, is buffered against temporal variation in brant.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)458-471
Number of pages14
JournalAmerican Naturalist
Volume193
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019

Funding

We thank the following people for assisting with work at Tutakoke River during this study: M. Blom, B. Cheatham, A. Clark, C. Deane, A. Ganick, D. Gibson, A. Greenawalt, E. Huskinson, H. Johnson, M. McClintock, D. Messmer, K. Navarre, T. Payton, M. Schreiner, H. Singer, L. Snoddy, A. Stewart, S. Walden, E. Willey, and N. Yeldell. Band resights at Bahia San Quintin, Mexico, were collected by K. Blake, C. Deane, K. Navarre, and C. Vennum and supported by the US Fish and Wildlife Service through the Arctic Goose Joint Venture and the Alaska Science Center, US Geological Survey. Band resights in the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia, Canada, were collected by G. Monty, A. Ritchie, and R. Swanston. Studies at the Tutakoke River colony were funded by the Alaska Science Center, US Geological Survey; Migratory Bird Management Region 7, US Fish and Wildlife Service; Ducks Unlimited; the Morro Bay Brant Group; Phil Jebbia (in memory of Marnie Shepherd); and the National Science Foundation (OPP-9214970, DEB-9815383, OPP-9985931, OPP-0196406, DEB-0743152, DEB-1252656). Logistical support at Tutakoke River was provided by the Yukon Delta National Wildlife Refuge and M. Irinaga and L. Gullingsrud of CH2M Hill Polar Services. Additional student support was provided to A.G.L. by the Dennis Raveling Scholarship (California Waterfowl Association) and a stipend award from the Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology program at the University of Nevada, Reno. The use of trade or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the US government. We thank the following people for assisting with work at Tuta-koke River duringthis study: M. Blom, B. Cheatham,A. Clark, C. Deane, A. Ganick, D. Gibson, A. Greenawalt, E. Huskin-son, H. Johnson, M. McClintock, D. Messmer, K. Navarre, T. Payton, M. Schreiner, H. Singer, L. Snoddy, A. Stewart, S. Walden, E. Willey, and N. Yeldell. Band resights at Bahia San Quintin, Mexico, were collected by K. Blake, C. Deane, K. Navarre, and C. Vennum and supported by the US Fish and Wildlife Service through the Arctic Goose Joint Venture and the Alaska Science Center, US Geological Survey. Band resights in the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia, Canada, were collected by G. Monty, A. Ritchie, and R. Swanston. Studies at the Tutakoke River colony were funded by the Alaska Science Center, US Geological Survey; Migratory Bird Management Region 7, US Fish and Wildlife Service; Ducks Unlimited; the Morro Bay Brant Group; Phil Jebbia (in memory of Marnie Shepherd); and the National Science Foundation (OPP-9214970, DEB-9815383, OPP-9985931, OPP-0196406, DEB-0743152, DEB-1252656). Logistical support at Tutakoke River was provided by the Yukon Delta National Wildlife Refuge and M. Irinaga and L. Gullingsrud of CH2M Hill Polar Services. Additional student support was provided to A.G.L. by the Dennis Raveling Scholarship (California Waterfowl Association) and a stipend award from the Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology program at the University of Nevada, Reno. The use of trade or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the US government.

FundersFunder number
Ducks Unlimited
DEB-0743152, OPP-9214970, DEB-1252656, DEB-9815383, OPP-0196406, OPP-9985931
University of Nevada, Reno

    Keywords

    • Barker robust design
    • Branta bernicla nigricans
    • Breeding probability
    • Costs of reproduction
    • Demographic buffering
    • Lack’s clutch size hypothesis

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Brood size affects future reproduction in a long-lived bird with precocial young'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this