Carbonate buffering and metabolic controls on carbon dioxide in rivers

  • Edward G. Stets
  • , David Butman
  • , Cory P. McDonald
  • , Sarah M. Stackpoole
  • , Michael D. DeGrandpre
  • , Robert G. Striegl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

125 Scopus citations

Abstract

Multiple processes support the significant efflux of carbon dioxide (CO2) from rivers and streams. Attribution of CO2 oversaturation will lead to better quantification of the freshwater carbon cycle and provide insights into the net cycling of nutrients and pollutants. CO2 production is closely related to O2 consumption because of the metabolic linkage of these gases. However, this relationship can be weakened due to dissolved inorganic carbon inputs from groundwater, carbonate buffering, calcification, and anaerobic metabolism. CO2 and O2 concentrations and other water quality parameters were analyzed in two data sets: a synoptic field study and nationwide water quality monitoring data. CO2 and O2 concentrations were strongly negatively correlated in both data sets (ρ = −0.67 and ρ = −0.63, respectively), although the correlations were weaker in high-alkalinity environments. In nearly all samples, the molar oversaturation of CO2 was a larger magnitude than molar O2 undersaturation. We used a dynamically coupled O2CO2 model to show that lags in CO2 air-water equilibration are a likely cause of this phenomenon. Lags in CO2 equilibration also impart landscape-scale differences in the behavior of CO2 between high- and low-alkalinity watersheds. Although the concept of carbonate buffering and how it creates lags in CO2 equilibration with the atmosphere is well understood, it has not been sufficiently integrated into our understanding of CO2 dynamics in freshwaters. We argue that the consideration of carbonate equilibria and its effects on CO2 dynamics are primary steps in understanding the sources and magnitude of CO2 oversaturation in rivers and streams.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)663-677
Number of pages15
JournalGlobal Biogeochemical Cycles
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2017

Funding

We thank Sydney Wilson, Mark Dornblaser, and John Crawford for assisting with the coordination and execution of field work and participating in important discussions on this topic. Two anonymous reviewers helped to improve the manuscript. We also thank the many U.S. Geological Survey personnel who measured streamflow and collected and analyzed water quality samples from the monitoring sites over the years. This work was supported by the USGS LandCarbon Project, the National Research Program, and the USGS Water, Energy, and Biogeochemical Budgets project. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. government. The data used are listed in the references and the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Information System repository at https://doi.org/10.5066/F7P55KJN.

    Keywords

    • biogeochemistry
    • carbon
    • metabolism
    • rivers
    • streams

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Carbonate buffering and metabolic controls on carbon dioxide in rivers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this