Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
UM Impact Home
Help & FAQ
Home
Profiles
Research units
Publications and Performances
Projects
Prizes
Engagement
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Choosing carbon mitigation strategies using ethical deliberation
Rebecca Bendick
, Kyla M. Dahlin
, Brian V. Smoliak
, Lori Kumler
, Sierra J. Jones
, Athena Aktipis
, Ezekiel Fugate
, Rachel Hertog
, Claus Moberg
, Dane Scott
Geosciences
Stanford University
Carnegie Institution of Washington
University of Washington
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
University of South Carolina
University of Arizona
Yale University
San Francisco State University
University of Wisconsin-Madison
University of Montana
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
4
Scopus citations
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Choosing carbon mitigation strategies using ethical deliberation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Engineering
Mitigation Strategy
100%
Climate Change
66%
Cost-Benefit Analysis
66%
Climatic Change
66%
Solar Energy
33%
Efficient Building
33%
Hydrogen Fuel
33%
Carbon Capture
33%
End-Users
33%
Feasibility Study
33%
Disconnections
33%
Greenhouse Gas
33%
Biofuel
33%
Fuel Cell
33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Emissions
100%
Climate Change
66%
Greenhouse Gas Emission
33%
Feasibility Study
33%
Hydrogen Fuels
33%
Ecological Impact
33%
Carbon Capture and Storage
33%
Solar Energy
33%
Wind Power
33%
Biofuel
33%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Cost Benefit Analysis
100%
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
50%
Economic Costs
50%
Direct Air Capture
50%
Feasibility Study
50%