Climate variables explain neutral and adaptive variation within salmonid metapopulations: The importance of replication in landscape genetics

  • Brian K. Hand
  • , Clint C. Muhlfeld
  • , Alisa A. Wade
  • , Ryan P. Kovach
  • , Diane C. Whited
  • , Shawn R. Narum
  • , Andrew P. Matala
  • , Michael W. Ackerman
  • , Brittany A. Garner
  • , John S. Kimball
  • , Jack A. Stanford
  • , Gordon Luikart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

Understanding how environmental variation influences population genetic structure is important for conservation management because it can reveal how human stressors influence population connectivity, genetic diversity and persistence. We used riverscape genetics modelling to assess whether climatic and habitat variables were related to neutral and adaptive patterns of genetic differentiation (population-specific and pairwise FST) within five metapopulations (79 populations, 4583 individuals) of steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in the Columbia River Basin, USA. Using 151 putatively neutral and 29 candidate adaptive SNP loci, we found that climate-related variables (winter precipitation, summer maximum temperature, winter highest 5% flow events and summer mean flow) best explained neutral and adaptive patterns of genetic differentiation within metapopulations, suggesting that climatic variation likely influences both demography (neutral variation) and local adaptation (adaptive variation). However, we did not observe consistent relationships between climate variables and FST across all metapopulations, underscoring the need for replication when extrapolating results from one scale to another (e.g. basin-wide to the metapopulation scale). Sensitivity analysis (leave-one-population-out) revealed consistent relationships between climate variables and FST within three metapopulations; however, these patterns were not consistent in two metapopulations likely due to small sample sizes (N = 10). These results provide correlative evidence that climatic variation has shaped the genetic structure of steelhead populations and highlight the need for replication and sensitivity analyses in land and riverscape genetics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)689-705
Number of pages17
JournalMolecular Ecology
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Funding

We thank the Department of the Interior Northwest Climate Science Center for providing funding for this study. Thanks to Steve Amish who provided helpful comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript. Thanks to Oscar Gaggiotti for very helpful advice on running the GESTE package. Thanks to Marie Kohler who helped edit the manuscript. Thank you to four anonymous reviewers who helped greatly in improving the study including the additional DISTLM analysis and the comparison between neutral and adaptive genetic differentiation. AW, JSK and GL were supported by NASA grant number NNX14AB84G. RK was supported by a USGS Mendenhall Fellowship. GL was also partially supported by NSF grants DEB-1050459 and DEB-1258203, and Montana Fish Wildlife and Parks. Bonneville Power Administration provided funding under project 2010-026-00 to MWA through the Idaho Department of Fish and Game, and under projects 2008-907-00, 2009-005-00 to SRN and APM. Any use of trade, firm or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

FundersFunder number
2010-026-00
Montana Fish Wildlife and Parks
DEB-1258203, DEB-1050459
National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNNX14AB84G
Idaho Department of Fish and Game 2008-907-00, 2009-005-00

    Keywords

    • adaptive genetic differentiation
    • conservation genetics
    • gene flow
    • landscape genomic modelling
    • population genomics
    • riverscape genetics
    • salmonids

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Climate variables explain neutral and adaptive variation within salmonid metapopulations: The importance of replication in landscape genetics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this