Collagen accumulation over time in the murine lung after exposure to crocidolite asbestos or libby amphibole

Aubrey M. Smartt, Mary Brezinski, Melanie Trapkus, Donald Gardner, Elizabeth A. Putnam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Libby, MT is the site of a closed vermiculite mine that produced ore contaminated with asbestos-like amphiboles. Worldwide distribution of the material and the long latency period for manifestation of asbestos-related diseases (ARDs) has created a significant health threat for many years to come. The composition of the Libby material [termed the Libby amphibole (LA)] differs from other well-studied types of asbestos in that it is a mixture of several amphibole fibers. The purpose of this study was to determine the fibrotic effects of LA exposure in a mouse model and to compare these effects to those of a wellcharacterized amphibole fiber, crocidolite asbestos. We exposed C57Bl/6 mice to LA or crocidolite and analyzed lung RNA, protein, and morphology at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months post instillation. Our results indicate that both forms of amphibole studied induced increased collagen types I and III mRNA expression and collagen protein deposition in exposed murine lungs compared to the PBS-instilled control lungs, and that these collagen increases were the most significant at 1 month after exposure. However, crocidolite-exposed mice demonstrated greater increases in collagen deposition than those exposed to LA, indicating that the fibrotic effects of LA exposure, although not as severe as those of crocidolite in this model system, were still able to induce collagen deposition.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)68-76
Number of pages9
JournalEnvironmental Toxicology
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2010

Keywords

  • Asbestos
  • Collagen
  • Extracellular matrix
  • Fibrosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Collagen accumulation over time in the murine lung after exposure to crocidolite asbestos or libby amphibole'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this