TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of oxygen uptake on-kinetic calculations in heart failure
AU - Arena, Ross
AU - Humphrey, Reed
AU - Peberdy, Mary Ann
AU - Madigan, Michael
PY - 2002/10/1
Y1 - 2002/10/1
N2 - Purpose: The analysis of oxygen (O2) uptake on-kinetics during steady-rate is gaining interest in the heart failure (HF) population. The rate change in O2 at the initiation of exercise can be assessed via nonlinear regression time constant (TC) or an algebraic equation (mean response time [MRT]). These calculations are presumed to be interchangeable, but research supporting this claim is limited. This investigation compares and contrasts two of the more commonly used O2 uptake on-kinetic calculations. Method: Twenty-eight subjects diagnosed with compensated HF and 19 age, sex, and activity-matched controls underwent a symptom-limited exercise test and a steady-rate exercise session (6 min). Peak O2 uptake, O2 uptake at ventilatory threshold, the O2 uptake TC (TC), and the O2 uptake mean response time (MRT) were calculated for each subject. Results: O2 uptake on-kinetics was significantly faster for the control group (P < 0.05) regardless of calculation method. There was a significant difference between the O2 uptake TC and MRT for the HF group. All O2 uptake on-kinetic calculations were significantly correlated with aerobic capacity. Conclusions: O2 uptake TC and MRT values may not be interchangeable in the HF population. All O2 uptake on-kinetic calculations did produce a significant difference between experimental and control groups and correlated with indicators of aerobic capacity. The 10-s O2 uptake on-kinetic calculations may be preferable secondary to expired gas fluctuations associated with breath-by-breath measures. Further work is, however, needed to determine which averaged O2 uptake on-kinetic expression is optimal given the significant difference between TC and MRT. A mechanism for this difference may be the oscillatory ventilatory expired gas pattern demonstrated by some patients with HF.
AB - Purpose: The analysis of oxygen (O2) uptake on-kinetics during steady-rate is gaining interest in the heart failure (HF) population. The rate change in O2 at the initiation of exercise can be assessed via nonlinear regression time constant (TC) or an algebraic equation (mean response time [MRT]). These calculations are presumed to be interchangeable, but research supporting this claim is limited. This investigation compares and contrasts two of the more commonly used O2 uptake on-kinetic calculations. Method: Twenty-eight subjects diagnosed with compensated HF and 19 age, sex, and activity-matched controls underwent a symptom-limited exercise test and a steady-rate exercise session (6 min). Peak O2 uptake, O2 uptake at ventilatory threshold, the O2 uptake TC (TC), and the O2 uptake mean response time (MRT) were calculated for each subject. Results: O2 uptake on-kinetics was significantly faster for the control group (P < 0.05) regardless of calculation method. There was a significant difference between the O2 uptake TC and MRT for the HF group. All O2 uptake on-kinetic calculations were significantly correlated with aerobic capacity. Conclusions: O2 uptake TC and MRT values may not be interchangeable in the HF population. All O2 uptake on-kinetic calculations did produce a significant difference between experimental and control groups and correlated with indicators of aerobic capacity. The 10-s O2 uptake on-kinetic calculations may be preferable secondary to expired gas fluctuations associated with breath-by-breath measures. Further work is, however, needed to determine which averaged O2 uptake on-kinetic expression is optimal given the significant difference between TC and MRT. A mechanism for this difference may be the oscillatory ventilatory expired gas pattern demonstrated by some patients with HF.
KW - Cardiac disease
KW - Exercise testing
KW - Expired gas analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036791910&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00005768-200210000-00006
DO - 10.1097/00005768-200210000-00006
M3 - Article
C2 - 12370556
AN - SCOPUS:0036791910
SN - 0195-9131
VL - 34
SP - 1563
EP - 1569
JO - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
JF - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
IS - 10
ER -