Compressional and em wave velocity anisotropy in a temperate glacier due to basal crevasses, and implications for water content estimation

John H. Bradford, Joshua Nichols, Joel T. Harper, Toby Meierbachtol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

We have conducted a series of experiments designed to investigate elastic and electromagnetic (EM) velocity anisotropy associated with a preferentially aligned fracture system on a temperate valley glacier in south-central Alaska, USA. Measurements include a three-dimensional compressional wave (P-wave) seismic reflection survey conducted over a 300m300m survey patch, with uniform source grid and static checkerboard receiver pattern. Additionally, we acquired a multiazimuth, multi-offset, polarimetric ground-penetrating radar (GPR) reflection experiment in a wagonwheel geometry with 948 of azimuthal coverage. Results show azimuthal variation in the P-wave normal-moveout velocity of >3% (3765 and 3630ms-1 in the fast and slow directions respectively) and difference of nearly 5% between the fast (0.164mns-1) and slow (0.156mns-1) EM velocities. Fracture orientations estimated from the GPR and seismic velocity data are consistent and indicate a preferred fracture orientation that is 30-458 oblique to glacier flow; these measurements agree with borehole observations. Anisotropic analysis of the polarimetric data gives a single volumetric water content estimate of 0.730.11%. We conclude that meaningful estimates of physical properties in glaciers based on EM or seismic velocity measurements require collecting data such that the presence of anisotropy can be evaluated and an anisotropic analysis employed when necessary.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)168-178
Number of pages11
JournalAnnals of Glaciology
Volume54
Issue number64
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Compressional and em wave velocity anisotropy in a temperate glacier due to basal crevasses, and implications for water content estimation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this