Abstract
The removal of riparian shading alters stream biogeochemical cycling by stimulating algal biofilms through the release of light limitation. Few studies have examined the combined effects of shading and biofilm growth on ammonium (NH4+–N) and nitrate (NO3−–N) removal in the same experiment. We quantified water column NH4+–N and NO3−–N removal using n = 176 short-term additions in four experimental streams over 2 years and assessed the influence of shading (shaded vs. open canopy) and biofilm colonization (early vs. late) on removal using a Bayesian three-level hierarchical model. First, we assessed the roles of biofilm and shade on NH4+–N removal. Shading lowered NH4+–N uptake velocity [Vf; slope: −0.45 (−0.69, −0.22)], while the effect of biofilm was too small to detect [0.06 (−0.18, 0.29)]. The following season, we compared NH4+–N and NO3−–N removal, and added night releases to estimate autotrophic and heterotrophic contributions to removal. Shading reduced NH4+–N and NO3−–N Vf, while the effect of biofilm often depended on shading. NH4+–N Vf was higher than NO3−–N Vf by 51% during the day and 38% at night, confirming preferential NH4+–N removal. NO3−–N Vf declined more between the Late-Open and Late-Shade phases compared to NH4+–N, suggesting a stronger decline in NO3−–N demand than for NH4+–N with shade during late biofilm colonization. We found no strong diel shift in NH4+–N or NO3−–N demand. Results demonstrate the primacy of light on NH4+–N and NO3−–N removal in streams. Understanding how shading and biofilm colonization alter removal is critical as streams are vulnerable to the impacts of land use change.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e2024JG008259 |
Journal | Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences |
Volume | 130 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 2025 |
Keywords
- biofilm
- diel conditions
- light
- nitrogen removal
- shading
- uptake velocity