Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Correction: Rangewide population genetic analysis of the Wood Turtle (Glyptemys insculpta)

  • Andrew R. Whiteley
  • , Dana Weigel-Sheedy
  • , Thomas S.B. Akre
  • , Donald J. Brown
  • , Deahn M. Donner
  • , Charlie Eichelberger
  • , Lori Erb
  • , Katharine D. Gipe
  • , Ellery Lassiter
  • , Michael N. Marchand
  • , Tricia Markle
  • , Donald F. McAlpine
  • , Jessica Meck
  • , Joshua Megyesy
  • , Alexander Robillard
  • , H. Patrick Roberts
  • , Ryan Roseen
  • , Sara M. Spaid
  • , Jeff Tamplin
  • , Ed Thompson
  • Derek T. Yorks, Lisabeth L. Willey, Michael T. Jones
  • University of Montana
  • United States Department of Agriculture
  • University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
  • New Hampshire Fish & Game Department
  • University of Massachusetts
  • West Virginia University
  • University of Northern Iowa
  • State of Maryland
  • Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife
  • Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife

Research output: Contribution to journal › Corrigenda / Errata

Abstract

In this article, Figure captions 3 and 4 are exchanged; they were ordered incorrectly. The correct order is displayed below. Incorrect version: Fig.3 Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components (DAPC) assuming K = 3 for 45 Wood Turtle collections. Individuals (points and colored lines connected to points) are colored by the population to which they were assigned by the discriminant analysis. Putatively admixed individuals are labeled with the color that corresponds to their population assignment but are connected with colored lines to the population from which they were sampled. The location of collection labels (or the black line segment issuing from the collection label) represents the centroid of that collection’s scores along each axis. The percentage of variation explained by each discriminant axis is shown in parentheses Fig. 4 Test for geographically continuous cline in population subdivision in the eastern portion of the Wood Turtle range for all collectionswith N ≥ 15. PC2 score per collection is on the y-axis. Latitude of each collection is on the x-axis. Midwestern (except east assigning MI_BR) collections were excluded Corrected version: Fig. 3 Test for geographically continuous cline in population subdivision in the eastern portion of the Wood Turtle range for all collectionswith N ≥ 15. PC2 score per collection is on the y-axis. Latitude of each collection is on the x-axis. Midwestern (except east assigning MI_BR) collections were excluded Fig.4 Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components (DAPC) assuming K = 3 for 45 Wood Turtle collections. Individuals (points and colored lines connected to points) are colored by the population to which they were assigned by the discriminant analysis. Putatively admixed individuals are labeled with the color that corresponds to their population assignment but are connected with colored lines to the population from which they were sampled. The location of collection labels (or the black line segment issuing from the collection label) represents the centroid of that collection’s scores along each axis. The percentage of variation explained by each discriminant axis is shown in parentheses The original article has been corrected.

Original languageEnglish
Article number71
JournalConservation Genetics
Volume27
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2026

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Correction: Rangewide population genetic analysis of the Wood Turtle (Glyptemys insculpta)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this