Abstract
With more than 15 sources of obsidian and other lithic materials, the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem of Montana, Wyoming, and Idaho is one of the richest toolstone regions in northwestern North America. This article introduces a quantitative assessment technique to compare attributes of seven Yellowstone obsidians used by Native Americans over at least 11,000 years. The proposed assessment technique is replicable and adaptable to other regions. This article also analyzes the procurement, use, and distribution of the poorly studied Cougar Creek obsidian. Archaeological research documented Cougar Creek obsidian outcrops, procurement areas, and secondary processing sites. Native Americans acquired the material at surface exposures, as well as occasional trench and pit excavations. There is a significant distance decay reduction in its use, especially when compared with Obsidian Cliff obsidian. Using a weighted z-score analysis, the material attributes of Cougar Creek were compared with those of six regional obsidians to determine the factors involved in their differential use. Based on these rankings, Cougar Creek obsidian experienced low demand and usage due to poor quality and availability. In contrast, due to their high quality, abundance, and aesthetics, Obsidian Cliff and Bear Gulch obsidians were preferred for stone tool production.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 158-178 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | American Antiquity |
| Volume | 84 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2019 |
Funding
Thanks go to Richard Hughes for conducting the energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence analysis for the Yellowstone projects included in this study. Thanks also go to Ann Johnson, Elaine Hale, Staffan Peterson, Tom James, and Tobin Roop for their work on these various projects. We would like to thank the University of Montana Department of Anthropology, as well as Yellowstone National Park, for providing resources for the completion of this research. The research was conducted under National Park Service grant P17AC00672 to the University of Montana. Thanks go to Brandon Bachman, Matt Nelson, Caleb Sobczak, Collin Price, Sean Flynn, Otto MacDonald, and Monte White for their participation in archaeological research for the project. Matt Nelson participated in lab and map work on the project. We intentionally left specific site and quarry area locations out of the article to prevent unauthorized artifact collection, which is illegal on federal land in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979, and the Antiquities Act of 1906. Interested researchers are encouraged to contact cultural resources staff at Yellowstone National Park to obtain more specific quarry locations and/ or to gain access to the Cougar Creek quarry area. Finally, we appreciate the comments and edits suggested by the four anonymous reviewers and editor Lynn Gamble.
| Funder number |
|---|
| P17AC00672 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Cougar creek: Quantitative assessment of obsidian use in the greater yellowstone ecosystem'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver