Coupled primary production and respiration in a large river contrasts with smaller rivers and streams

  • Sarah S. Roley
  • , Robert O. Hall
  • , William Perkins
  • , Vanessa A. Garayburu-Caruso
  • , James C. Stegen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Although time series in ecosystem metabolism are well characterized in small and medium rivers, patterns in the world's largest rivers are almost unknown. Large rivers present technical difficulties, including depth measurements, gas exchange ((Formula presented.), (Formula presented.)) estimates, and the presence of large dams, which can supersaturate gases. We estimated reach-scale metabolism for the Hanford Reach of the Columbia River (Washington state, USA), a free-flowing stretch with an average discharge of 3173 (Formula presented.) (Formula presented.). We calculated (Formula presented.) from semi-empirical models and directly estimated it from tracer measurements. We fixed (Formula presented.) at the median value from these calculations (0.5 (Formula presented.)), and used maximum likelihood to estimate reach-scale, open-channel metabolism. Both gross primary production (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (ER) were high (GPP range: 0.3–30.8 g (Formula presented.) (Formula presented.) (Formula presented.), ER range: 0.8–30.6 g (Formula presented.) (Formula presented.) (Formula presented.)), with peak GPP and ER occurring in the late summer or early fall. GPP increased exponentially with temperature, consistent with metabolic theory, while light was seasonally saturating. Annual average GPP, estimated at 1500 g carbon (Formula presented.) (Formula presented.), was in the top 2% of estimates for other rivers. GPP and ER were tightly coupled and 90% of GPP was immediately respired, resulting in net ecosystem production near 0. Patterns in the Hanford Reach contrast with those in small-medium rivers, suggesting that metabolism magnitudes and patterns in large rivers may not be simply scaled from knowledge of smaller rivers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2461-2475
Number of pages15
JournalLimnology and Oceanography
Volume68
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023

Funding

Thanks to Lupita Renteria and Flora Yeager for field assistance. Two anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments that improved this paper. R.O.H. was supported by the Modelscape project, NSF 2019528. This study was partially funded by the River Corridor Science Focus Area (SFA) at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). PNNL is operated by Battelle Memorial Institute for the US DOE under Contract No. DE‐AC05‐76RL01830. The SFA is supported by the US DOE, Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER), Environmental System Science (ESS) Program.

FundersFunder number
2019528
DE‐AC05‐76RL01830
Battelle
Biological and Environmental Research
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Coupled primary production and respiration in a large river contrasts with smaller rivers and streams'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this