Differential Vulnerability: Disentangling the Effects of State Dependence and Population Heterogeneity on Repeat Victimization

Jody Clay-Warner, Jackson M. Bunch, Jennifer McMahon-Howard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

It is well established that victimization is associated with increased risk of future victimization. According to state dependence arguments, this occurs because the victimization event changes either the individual or the social environment in ways that elevate risk. In contrast, the population heterogeneity perspective argues that the association between victimization events is spurious. Empirical research finds that state dependence and population heterogeneity jointly contribute to risk of repeat victimization, but research has not been able to specify the nature of the relationship between state dependence, population heterogeneity, and repeat victimization risk. Here, we propose that state dependence processes vary across levels of underlying propensity for victimization. Using propensity score matching with longitudinal data from the National Crime Victimization Survey, we find that state dependence effects operate differently depending upon one’s underlying risk of victimization and that the pattern of these effects differ for property and violent victimization.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1406-1429
Number of pages24
JournalCriminal Justice and Behavior
Volume43
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

Keywords

  • population heterogeneity
  • propensity score matching
  • repeat victimization
  • state dependence
  • victimization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differential Vulnerability: Disentangling the Effects of State Dependence and Population Heterogeneity on Repeat Victimization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this