Early Warnings for State Transitions

  • Caleb P. Roberts
  • , Dirac Twidwell
  • , Jessica L. Burnett
  • , Victoria M. Donovan
  • , Carissa L. Wonkka
  • , Christine L. Bielski
  • , Ahjond S. Garmestani
  • , David G. Angeler
  • , Tarsha Eason
  • , Brady W. Allred
  • , Matthew O. Jones
  • , David E. Naugle
  • , Shana M. Sundstrom
  • , Craig R. Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

New concepts have emerged in theoretical ecology with the intent to quantify complexities in ecological change that are unaccounted for in state-and-transition models and to provide applied ecologists with statistical early warning metrics able to predict and prevent state transitions. With its rich history of furthering ecological theory and its robust and broad-scale monitoring frameworks, the rangeland discipline is poised to empirically assess these newly proposed ideas while also serving as early adopters of novel statistical metrics that provide advanced warning of a pending shift to an alternative ecological regime. We review multivariate early warning and regime shift detection metrics, identify situations where various metrics will be most useful for rangeland science, and then highlight known shortcomings. Our review of a suite of multivariate-based regime shift/early warning indicators provides a broad range of metrics applicable to a wide variety of data types or contexts, from situations where a great deal is known about the key system drivers and a regime shift is hypothesized a priori, to situations where the key drivers and the possibility of a regime shift are both unknown. These metrics can be used to answer ecological state-and-transition questions, inform policymakers, and provide quantitative decision-making tools for managers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)659-670
Number of pages12
JournalRangeland Ecology and Management
Volume71
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2018

Funding

This project was supported by funds from the Department of Defense Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (W912HQ-15-C-0018), Nebraska Game & Parks Commission (W-125-R-1), the August T. Larsson Foundation of the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, the USDA NRCS Working Lands for Wildlife, Sage Grouse Initiative, Wildlife Conservation Effects Assessment Project, and the University of Nebraska's Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources. The Nature Conservancy also provided partial support for this work through the Nebraska Chapter's J.E. Weaver Competitive Grants Program. We are also thankful for feedback provided by international partners from the Complexity Science Working Group, hosted at the University of Nebraska, in particular, we thank Hannah E. Birge for advice and assistance in creating the glossary table. The Nebraska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit is jointly supported by a cooperative agreement between the US Geological Survey, the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, the University of Nebraska–Lincoln, the US Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Wildlife Management Institute. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not represent the views or policies of the US Environmental Protection Agency. This project was supported by funds from the Department of Defense Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (W912HQ-15-C-0018), Nebraska Game & Parks Commission (W-125-R-1), the August T. Larsson Foundation of the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, the USDA NRCS Working Lands for Wildlife, Sage Grouse Initiative, Wildlife Conservation Effects Assessment Project, and the University of Nebraska’s Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources. The Nature Conservancy also provided partial support for this work through the Nebraska Chapter’s J.E. Weaver Competitive Grants Program. We are also thankful for feedback provided by international partners from the Complexity Science Working Group, hosted at the University of Nebraska, in particular, we thank Hannah E. Birge for advice and assistance in creating the glossary table. The Nebraska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit is jointly supported by a cooperative agreement between the US Geological Survey, the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, the University of Nebraska–Lincoln, the US Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Wildlife Management Institute. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not represent the views or policies of the US Environmental Protection Agency.

FundersFunder number
W912HQ-15-C-0018
Nebraska Game and Parks CommissionW-125-R-1
Nebraska Game and Parks Commission
Sage Grouse Initiative
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
1735362

    Keywords

    • early warning
    • rangeland monitoring
    • regime shift
    • resilience
    • spatial regimes
    • state-and-transition model

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Early Warnings for State Transitions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this