Effects of livestock grazing on nesting sage-grouse in central Montana

  • Joseph T. Smith
  • , Jason D. Tack
  • , Lorelle I. Berkeley
  • , Mark Szczypinski
  • , David E. Naugle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Grazing by domestic livestock is ubiquitous in the sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) biome of western North America. Widespread, long-term population declines in greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) have elicited concern about negative effects of livestock grazing on sage-grouse populations. Hypothesized relationships, mostly untested, between livestock and sage-grouse nesting ecology have played a prominent role in shaping public land livestock grazing policy and broader discussions about management of grazing in sagebrush ecosystems. We tested predictions arising from several commonly hypothesized mechanisms by which livestock may affect nesting habitat quality for sage-grouse in a grazed landscape in central Montana, USA. We employed Bayesian variable selection methods to identify factors related to both nest site selection and nest success, focusing on indices of livestock use at local and pasture scales and including other factors known to influence nesting ecology such as anthropogenic features and weather. In spite of some evidence nest survival was positively associated with senesced vegetation height, evidence for effects of livestock presence and indices of local livestock use on nest site selection and survival was equivocal at best. In contrast, we found strong evidence that females selected nest sites based on relatively static features such as sagebrush cover and distance from gravel and paved roads, whereas nest failure was driven primarily by extended periods of heavy precipitation. Management of sage-grouse nesting habitat in this region should focus on conserving areas of adequate shrub cover and preventing further fragmentation by roads.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1503-1515
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Wildlife Management
Volume82
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2018

Funding

The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Earlier versions of this manuscript were improved by comments from V. J. Dreitz, J. A. Gude, M. Hebblewhite, P. M. Lukacs, J. D. Maestas, J. J. Nowak, and 2 anonymous reviewers. Funding was provided by grants from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service's Conservation Effects Assessment Project and Conservation Innovation Grant Program; the sale of hunting and fishing licenses in Montana; Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration grant W-158-R; Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks Upland Game Bird Enhancement Program; U.S. Bureau of Land Management Cooperative Agreement L15AC00097; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Cooperative Agreement Award F14AC01224; Safari Club International Foundation, and the Big Sky Upland Bird Association.

FundersFunder number
F14AC01224
Natural Resources Conservation Service69-3A75-10-151

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 15 - Life on Land
      SDG 15 Life on Land

    Keywords

    • Centrocercus urophasianus
    • greater sage-grouse
    • habitat selection
    • livestock
    • nest survival
    • northern Great Plains
    • roads
    • weather

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of livestock grazing on nesting sage-grouse in central Montana'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this