Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Environmental DNA Methods for Ecological Monitoring and Biodiversity Assessment in Estuaries

  • Raman P. Nagarajan
  • , Mallory Bedwell
  • , Ann E. Holmes
  • , Thiago Sanches
  • , Shawn Acuña
  • , Melinda Baerwald
  • , Matthew A. Barnes
  • , Scott Blankenship
  • , Richard E. Connon
  • , Kristy Deiner
  • , Daphne Gille
  • , Caren S. Goldberg
  • , Margaret E. Hunter
  • , Christopher L. Jerde
  • , Gordon Luikart
  • , Rachel S. Meyer
  • , Alison Watts
  • , Andrea Schreier
  • University of California at Davis
  • State of California
  • Texas Tech University
  • Cramer Fish Sciences – Genidaqs
  • Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich
  • Washington State University Pullman
  • United States Geological Survey
  • University of California at Santa Barbara
  • University of California at Santa Cruz
  • University of New Hampshire

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

66 Scopus citations

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) detection methods can complement traditional biomonitoring to yield new ecological insights in aquatic systems. However, the conceptual and methodological frameworks for aquatic eDNA detection and interpretation were developed primarily in freshwater environments and have not been well established for estuaries and marine environments that are by nature dynamic, turbid, and hydrologically complex. Environmental context and species life history are critical for successful application of eDNA methods, and the challenges associated with eDNA detection in estuaries were the subject of a symposium held at the University of California Davis on January 29, 2020 (https://marinescience.ucdavis.edu/engagement/past-events/edna). Here, we elaborate upon topics addressed in the symposium to evaluate eDNA methods in the context of monitoring and biodiversity studies in estuaries. We first provide a concise overview of eDNA science and methods, and then examine the San Francisco Estuary (SFE) as a case study to illustrate how eDNA detection can complement traditional monitoring programs and provide regional guidance on future potential eDNA applications. Additionally, we offer recommendations for enhancing communication between eDNA scientists and natural resource managers, which is essential for integrating eDNA methods into existing monitoring programs. Our intent is to create a resource that is accessible to those outside the field of eDNA, especially managers, without oversimplifying the challenges or advantages of these methods.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2254-2273
Number of pages20
JournalEstuaries and Coasts
Volume45
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2022

Funding

We thank the Delta Stewardship Council for funding the publication of this paper and partially funding the symposium. We thank Carole Hom for leading the organization of the symposium and UC Davis Coastal and Marine Sciences Institute (CMSI) for providing funding for the symposium. We thank Brian Schreier, Ted Sommer, and Nicole Kwan for helpful comments and suggestions, and Sarah Stinson for help with notetaking at the post-symposium round table discussion. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the United States Government.

Funders
United States Government Publishing Office

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 14 - Life Below Water
      SDG 14 Life Below Water
    2. SDG 15 - Life on Land
      SDG 15 Life on Land

    Keywords

    • Biodiversity
    • Environmental DNA
    • Estuary
    • Invasive species
    • Monitoring
    • San Francisco Estuary

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Environmental DNA Methods for Ecological Monitoring and Biodiversity Assessment in Estuaries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this