TY - JOUR
T1 - Environmental Inequities and Water Policy During a Drought
T2 - Burdened Communities, Minority Residents, and Cutback Assignments
AU - Wikstrom, Kristoffer
AU - Miller, Trisha
AU - Campbell, Heather E.
AU - Tschudi, Michael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Policy Studies Organization
PY - 2019/1
Y1 - 2019/1
N2 - In 2014 the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) released CalEnviroScreen 2.0, developed to identify communities facing “multiple burdens of pollution and socioeconomic disadvantage” (CalEnviroScreen FAQs, 2016). Contemporaneously, California was suffering a severe drought. CalEPA implemented emergency water cutbacks such that community allowances ranged from approximately 70%–430% of the U.S. average for water consumption. Decades of research find that racial and ethnic minorities face greater environmental burdens than others. Did the CalEPA cutbacks disproportionately affect already burdened communities or those with higher percentages of minorities? Using geographic information systems and spatial regression analysis, we find that the water cutbacks did not, ceteris paribus, further stress already burdened communities, but communities with a more significant percentage of Hispanics are estimated to receive lower water allowances even controlling for poverty. This research broadens the areas in which we can look for environmental (in)justice beyond standard dis/amenities, and implies that even intra-organizational policy goals of reducing environmental justice burdens may not be enough.
AB - In 2014 the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) released CalEnviroScreen 2.0, developed to identify communities facing “multiple burdens of pollution and socioeconomic disadvantage” (CalEnviroScreen FAQs, 2016). Contemporaneously, California was suffering a severe drought. CalEPA implemented emergency water cutbacks such that community allowances ranged from approximately 70%–430% of the U.S. average for water consumption. Decades of research find that racial and ethnic minorities face greater environmental burdens than others. Did the CalEPA cutbacks disproportionately affect already burdened communities or those with higher percentages of minorities? Using geographic information systems and spatial regression analysis, we find that the water cutbacks did not, ceteris paribus, further stress already burdened communities, but communities with a more significant percentage of Hispanics are estimated to receive lower water allowances even controlling for poverty. This research broadens the areas in which we can look for environmental (in)justice beyond standard dis/amenities, and implies that even intra-organizational policy goals of reducing environmental justice burdens may not be enough.
KW - environment
KW - governance
KW - regional governance
KW - urban studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046414257&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ropr.12301
DO - 10.1111/ropr.12301
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85046414257
SN - 1541-132X
VL - 36
SP - 4
EP - 27
JO - Review of Policy Research
JF - Review of Policy Research
IS - 1
ER -