False samples are not the same as blind controls: Informal efforts to "test" a laboratory corrupt the data stream, where integrity is crucial

L. Scott Mills

doi:10.1038/415471a

False samples are not the same as blind controls: Informal efforts to "test" a laboratory corrupt the data stream, where integrity is crucial

Research and Creative Scholarship

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	471
Number of pages	1
Journal	Nature
Volume	415
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1038/415471a
State	Published - Jan 31 2002

Access to Document

10.1038/415471a

Cite this

@article{7d51d8e7805f4c0c82b6e704f21a03e7,

title = "False samples are not the same as blind controls: Informal efforts to {"}test{"} a laboratory corrupt the data stream, where integrity is crucial",

author = "Mills, {L. Scott}",

year = "2002",

month = jan,

day = "31",

doi = "10.1038/415471a",

language = "English",

volume = "415",

pages = "471",

journal = "Nature",

issn = "0028-0836",

publisher = "Nature Research",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - False samples are not the same as blind controls

T2 - Informal efforts to "test" a laboratory corrupt the data stream, where integrity is crucial

AU - Mills, L. Scott

PY - 2002/1/31

Y1 - 2002/1/31

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037203817&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/415471a

DO - 10.1038/415471a

M3 - Letter

C2 - 11823824

AN - SCOPUS:0037203817

SN - 0028-0836

VL - 415

SP - 471

JO - Nature

JF - Nature

ER -

False samples are not the same as blind controls: Informal efforts to "test" a laboratory corrupt the data stream, where integrity is crucial

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this