Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Estimating densities for sympatric kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis) and coyotes (Canis latrans) using noninvasive genetic sampling

  • Robert C. Lonsinger
  • , P. M. Lukacs
  • , E. M. Gese
  • , R. N. Knight
  • , L. P. Waits

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Kit fox (Vulpes macrotis Merriam, 1888) populations in the Great Basin Desert have declined and are of increasing concern for managers. Increasing coyote (Canis latrans Say, 1823) abundance and subsequent intraguild interactions may be one cause for this decline. Concurrent monitoring of carnivores is challenging and therefore rarely conducted. One possible solution for monitoring elusive carnivores is using noninvasive genetic sampling. We used noninvasive genetic sampling to collect fecal DNA from kit foxes and coyotes and estimate their densities from 2013–2014 in Utah, USA. We identified individuals based on microsatellite genotypes and estimated density with multisession spatially explicit capture–recapture models. Mean kit fox density was 0.02 foxes·km−2, while coyote densities were up to four times greater (0.07–0.08 coyotes·km−2). Kit fox densities were significantly lower than densities in the 1950s but were comparable with estimates from the late 1990s, suggesting that populations may be stabilizing after a precipitous decline. Our kit fox density estimates were among the lowest documented for the species. Our coyote density estimate was the first reported in our region and revealed that despite seemingly high abundance, densities are low compared with other regions. Our results suggested that kit foxes may be able to coexist with coyotes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1080-1089
Number of pages10
JournalCanadian Journal of Zoology
Volume96
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018

Funding

We thank B. Kluever, E. Burke, J. Decotis, T. Edwards, M. Melham, C. Perkins, M. Richmond, and M. Smith for assistance with fieldwork and J. Adams and Waits Lab technicians for assistance with laboratory procedures. We thank the U.S. Army Dugway Proving Ground Natural Resource Management Program, namely K. Marvel, M. Peters, R. Delph, and J. Delph, for logistical support. The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources provided housing. This work was funded in part by the U.S. Army Research Laboratory and the U.S. Army Research Office (Grant RC-201205), the U.S. Department of Defense Environmental Security Technology Certification (Grant 12 EB-RC5-006) and Legacy Resource Management (Grant W9132T-12-2-0050) programs, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, the National Geo-graphic Society’s Conservation Trust (Grant C248-13), and T&E, Inc. Two anonymous reviewers provided useful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

FundersFunder number
12 EB-RC5-006
United States Army Research LaboratoryRC-201205

    Keywords

    • Canis latrans
    • Coyote
    • Density
    • Kit fox
    • Noninvasive genetic sampling
    • Recapture
    • Spatial capture
    • Vulpes macrotis

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Estimating densities for sympatric kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis) and coyotes (Canis latrans) using noninvasive genetic sampling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this