Estimating ungulate recruitment and growth rates using age ratios

Nicholas J. Decesare, Mark Hebblewhite, Mark Bradley, Kirby G. Smith, David Hervieux, Lalenia Neufeld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

60 Scopus citations

Abstract

Trends in population growth can be monitored with data for key vital rates without knowledge of abundance. Although adult female survival has the highest elasticity for ungulate population dynamics, the more variable recruitment rates are commonly monitored to track local variation in growth rates. Specifically, recruitment is often measured using late winter young:adult age ratios, though these age ratios are difficult to reliably interpret given the contribution of multiple vital rates to annual ratios. We show that the supplementation of age ratio data with concurrent radio-telemetry monitoring of adult female survival allows both retrospective estimation of empirical population growth rates and the decomposition of recruitment-specific vital rates. We demonstrate the estimation of recruitment and population growth rates for 1 woodland caribou population using these methods, including elasticity and life-stage simulation analysis of the relative contribution of adult female survival and recruitment rates to variation in population growth. We show, for this woodland caribou population, that adult female survival and recruitment rates were nearly equivalent drivers of population growth. We recommend the concurrent monitoring of adult female survival to reliably interpret age ratios when managing caribou and other ungulates. © 2011 The Wildlife Society.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)144-153
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Wildlife Management
Volume76
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012

Keywords

  • Rangifer tarandus caribou
  • age ratios
  • matrix models
  • recruitment
  • survival
  • ungulates
  • woodland caribou

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Estimating ungulate recruitment and growth rates using age ratios'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this