Evaluating the efficacy and equity of environmental stopgap measures

Holly Jean Buck; Laura Jane Martin; Oliver Geden; Peter Kareiva; Liz Koslov; Will Krantz; Ben Kravitz; John Noël; Edward A. Parson; Christopher J. Preston; Daniel L. Sanchez; Lynn Scarlett; Shuchi Talati

doi:10.1038/s41893-020-0497-6

Evaluating the efficacy and equity of environmental stopgap measures

Holly Jean Buck, Laura Jane Martin, Oliver Geden, Peter Kareiva, Liz Koslov, Will Krantz, Ben Kravitz, John Noël, Edward A. Parson, Christopher J. Preston, Daniel L. Sanchez, Lynn Scarlett, Shuchi Talati

Philosophy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

Contemporary environmental policy is replete with measures that do not fully resolve a problem but are proposed instead to ‘buy time’ for the development of more-durable solutions. We define such measures as ‘stopgap measures’ and examine examples from wildfire risk management, hydrochlorofluorocarbon regulation and Colorado River water management. We introduce an analytical framework to assess stopgaps and apply this framework to solar geoengineering, a controversial stopgap for reducing emissions. Studying stopgaps as a distinct response to environmental crises can help us weigh their merits in comparison to alternative policy and management measures.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	499-504
Number of pages	6
Journal	Nature Sustainability
Volume	3
Issue number	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0497-6
State	Published - Jul 1 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1038/s41893-020-0497-6

Cite this

@article{7a03fa3d293c4224b6f2d60bb36efa60,

title = "Evaluating the efficacy and equity of environmental stopgap measures",

abstract = "Contemporary environmental policy is replete with measures that do not fully resolve a problem but are proposed instead to {\textquoteleft}buy time{\textquoteright} for the development of more-durable solutions. We define such measures as {\textquoteleft}stopgap measures{\textquoteright} and examine examples from wildfire risk management, hydrochlorofluorocarbon regulation and Colorado River water management. We introduce an analytical framework to assess stopgaps and apply this framework to solar geoengineering, a controversial stopgap for reducing emissions. Studying stopgaps as a distinct response to environmental crises can help us weigh their merits in comparison to alternative policy and management measures.",

author = "Buck, {Holly Jean} and Martin, {Laura Jane} and Oliver Geden and Peter Kareiva and Liz Koslov and Will Krantz and Ben Kravitz and John No{\"e}l and Parson, {Edward A.} and Preston, {Christopher J.} and Sanchez, {Daniel L.} and Lynn Scarlett and Shuchi Talati",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020, Springer Nature Limited.",

year = "2020",

month = jul,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1038/s41893-020-0497-6",

language = "English",

volume = "3",

pages = "499--504",

journal = "Nature Sustainability",

issn = "2398-9629",

publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating the efficacy and equity of environmental stopgap measures

AU - Buck, Holly Jean

AU - Martin, Laura Jane

AU - Geden, Oliver

AU - Kareiva, Peter

AU - Koslov, Liz

AU - Krantz, Will

AU - Kravitz, Ben

AU - Noël, John

AU - Parson, Edward A.

AU - Preston, Christopher J.

AU - Sanchez, Daniel L.

AU - Scarlett, Lynn

AU - Talati, Shuchi

PY - 2020/7/1

Y1 - 2020/7/1

N2 - Contemporary environmental policy is replete with measures that do not fully resolve a problem but are proposed instead to ‘buy time’ for the development of more-durable solutions. We define such measures as ‘stopgap measures’ and examine examples from wildfire risk management, hydrochlorofluorocarbon regulation and Colorado River water management. We introduce an analytical framework to assess stopgaps and apply this framework to solar geoengineering, a controversial stopgap for reducing emissions. Studying stopgaps as a distinct response to environmental crises can help us weigh their merits in comparison to alternative policy and management measures.

AB - Contemporary environmental policy is replete with measures that do not fully resolve a problem but are proposed instead to ‘buy time’ for the development of more-durable solutions. We define such measures as ‘stopgap measures’ and examine examples from wildfire risk management, hydrochlorofluorocarbon regulation and Colorado River water management. We introduce an analytical framework to assess stopgaps and apply this framework to solar geoengineering, a controversial stopgap for reducing emissions. Studying stopgaps as a distinct response to environmental crises can help us weigh their merits in comparison to alternative policy and management measures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083379433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41893-020-0497-6

DO - 10.1038/s41893-020-0497-6

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85083379433

SN - 2398-9629

VL - 3

SP - 499

EP - 504

JO - Nature Sustainability

JF - Nature Sustainability

IS - 7

ER -

Evaluating the efficacy and equity of environmental stopgap measures

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this