Explorations of preferred and maximum booking windows among U.S. national park campers: Implications for improved fairness

William L. Rice, B. Derrick Taff, Sophie A. Morris, Bing Pan, Colby Parkinson, Peter Newman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this research note is to inform national park management regarding the strategies in rationing campsites in popular U.S. national park campgrounds and provide data-driven guidance for the design of more fair and equitable methods for distributing limited, highly demanded campsites. To explore preferences in campsite rationing techniques and preferred and maximum campsite booking windows, we collected survey data among randomly sampled onsite visitors in Grand Canyon National Park at scenic viewpoints and Mather Campground in 2023. The rationing technique with the highest level of positive support was advance reservation, followed by a combination of time frames for booking window (e.g., 6-month, 2- month, and 2-week) and a combination of rationing techniques (e.g., advance reservation and first-come, first-serve). Concerning fairness and equity, we found that respondents in higher annual household income groups had a longer maximum booking window, on average, than those in lower income groups. Thus, we discuss the merits of offering a diversity of booking windows to meet the needs of multiple groups, each with constrained booking horizons.

Original languageEnglish
JournalTourism and Hospitality Research
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 3 2024

Keywords

  • access
  • camping
  • equity
  • Grand Canyon National Park
  • Rationing
  • reservation systems
  • U.S. national parks

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Explorations of preferred and maximum booking windows among U.S. national park campers: Implications for improved fairness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this