TY - JOUR
T1 - Fodor, modularity, and speech perception
AU - Appelbaum, Irene
PY - 1998
Y1 - 1998
N2 - Fodor argues that speech perception is accomplished by a module. Typically, modular processing is taken to be bottom-up processing. Yet there is ubiquitous empirical evidence that speech perception is influenced by top-down processing. Fodor attempts to resolve this conflict by denying that modular processing must be exclusively bottom-up. It is argued, however, that Fodor's attempt to reconcile top-down and modular processing fails, because: (i) it undermines Fodor's own conception of modular processing; and (ii) it cannot account for the contextually varying top-down influences that characterize speech perception.
AB - Fodor argues that speech perception is accomplished by a module. Typically, modular processing is taken to be bottom-up processing. Yet there is ubiquitous empirical evidence that speech perception is influenced by top-down processing. Fodor attempts to resolve this conflict by denying that modular processing must be exclusively bottom-up. It is argued, however, that Fodor's attempt to reconcile top-down and modular processing fails, because: (i) it undermines Fodor's own conception of modular processing; and (ii) it cannot account for the contextually varying top-down influences that characterize speech perception.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032220938&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09515089808573264
DO - 10.1080/09515089808573264
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0032220938
SN - 0951-5089
VL - 11
SP - 317
EP - 330
JO - Philosophical Psychology
JF - Philosophical Psychology
IS - 3
ER -