Abstract
Fodor argues that speech perception is accomplished by a module. Typically, modular processing is taken to be bottom-up processing. Yet there is ubiquitous empirical evidence that speech perception is influenced by top-down processing. Fodor attempts to resolve this conflict by denying that modular processing must be exclusively bottom-up. It is argued, however, that Fodor's attempt to reconcile top-down and modular processing fails, because: (i) it undermines Fodor's own conception of modular processing; and (ii) it cannot account for the contextually varying top-down influences that characterize speech perception.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 317-330 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Philosophical Psychology |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1998 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Fodor, modularity, and speech perception'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver