For Remote Sensing in Political Geography: Scalar Flexibility, the Ethics of Exposure, and Critiques of the State

Mia M. Bennett, Hilary O. Faxon, Luis F.Alvarez Leon, Colin J. Gleason, Beth Tellman

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Remote sensing is a method little used by political geographers. Such reluctance is partly because the scientific technique employs positivist methods. Political geographers have critiqued these since the critical turn, when the field began to reflexively question its own theories and methods. Yet, remotely sensed data offers a novel way of examining human-environment relationships from the sub-meter to planetary scales. In this chapter, we first briefly introduce remote sensing and suggest tools and resources for political geographers to familiarize themselves with its data and methods. We then explain satellite imagery’s usefulness to political geographers who critique the state methodologically and politically. Finally, we offer a brief case study of Zomia, the region comprising the Southeast Asia Massif. We combine remote sensing and ethnography to illustrate how analysis of satellite imagery can help to escape methodological nationalism and critique the territorial state as an organizing concept both in geographical theory and in society.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPolitical Geography in Practice
Subtitle of host publicationTheories, Approaches, Methodologies
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages135-158
Number of pages24
ISBN (Electronic)9783031698996
ISBN (Print)9783031698989
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2024

Keywords

  • Critical remote sensing
  • Data
  • Satellites
  • Zomia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'For Remote Sensing in Political Geography: Scalar Flexibility, the Ethics of Exposure, and Critiques of the State'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this