Frequency-magnitude distribution of debris flows compiled from global data, and comparison with post-fire debris flows in the western U.S.

Karin L. Riley, Rebecca Bendick, Kevin D. Hyde, Emmanuel J. Gabet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

52 Scopus citations

Abstract

Forecasting debris flow hazard is challenging due to the episodic occurrence of debris flows in response to stochastic precipitation and, in some areas, wildfires. In order to facilitate hazard assessment, we have gathered available records of debris flow volumes into the first comprehensive global catalog of debris flows (n=988). We also present results of field collection of recent debris flows (n=77) in the northern Rocky Mountains, where debris flow frequency increases following wildfire. As a first step in parameterizing hazard models, we use frequency-magnitude distributions and empirical cumulative distribution functions (ECDFs) to compare volumes of post-fire debris flows to non-fire-related debris flows. The ECDF of post-fire debris flow volumes is significantly different (at 95% confidence) from that of non-fire-related debris flows, suggesting that the post-fire distribution is composed of a higher proportion of small events than that of non-fire-related debris flows. The slope of the frequency-magnitude distribution of post-fire debris flows is steeper than that of non-fire-related debris flows, corroborating evidence that small post-fire debris flows occur with a higher relative frequency than non-fire-related debris flows. Taken together, the statistical analyses suggest that post-fire debris flows come from a different population than non-fire-related debris flows, and their hazard must be modeled separately. We propose two possible non-exclusive explanations for the fact that the post-fire environment produces a higher proportion of small debris flows: 1) following fires, smaller storms or effective drainage areas can trigger debris flows due to increased runoff and/or decreases in root strength, resulting in smaller volumes and increased probability of failure, and 2) fire increases the probability and frequency of debris flows, causing their distribution to shift toward smaller events due to limitations in sediment supply.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)118-128
Number of pages11
JournalGeomorphology
Volume191
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2013

Funding

This study was funded in part by a Geological Society of America Graduate Student Research Grant and a University of Montana Transboundary Research Award to Karin Riley. This work was also funded in part by the U.S. Forest Service's Rocky Mountain Research Station and Western Wildland Environmental Threat Center . We are grateful for intrepid off-trail field help at the mercy of wasps and bears, from Davis Bothe, Esther Bowlin, Brian Elling, Dan Hoffmann, Morgan Hyde, Chuck Irestone, Jack Kehoe, Solmaz Mohadjer, and Warren Roe. We appreciate collaboration with Sue Cannon, Anna Klene, and Henk van Steijn throughout this project, as well as constructive review of this manuscript by Isaac Grenfell. Sue Cannon, Oldrich Hungr, Dieter Rickenmann, and Henk van Steijn generously provided extensive unpublished datasets that are included in the catalog.

Funders
Geological Society of America

    Keywords

    • Debris flow
    • Fire
    • Frequency
    • Magnitude

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Frequency-magnitude distribution of debris flows compiled from global data, and comparison with post-fire debris flows in the western U.S.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this