Genetic variation and hybridization determine the outcomes of conservation reintroductions

Colter A. Feuerstein, Ryan P. Kovach, Carter G. Kruse, Matt E. Jaeger, Donovan A. Bell, Zachary L. Robinson, Andrew R. Whiteley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The preservation of genetic variation is fundamental in biodiversity conservation, yet its importance for population viability remains contentious. Mixed-source reintroductions, where individuals are translocated into a single vacant habitat from multiple genetically divergent and often depauperate populations, provide an opportunity to evaluate how genetic variation and hybridization influence individual and relative population fitness. Population genetic theory predicts that individuals with higher genetic variation and hybrids among populations should have higher fitness. We tested these two hypotheses by analyzing individual and population-scale data for westslope cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii lewisi) in four mixed-source reintroductions. We observed more hybrid and fewer nonhybrid offspring than expected across four independent mixed-source reintroductions. We also found clear evidence that heterozygosity influenced individual reproductive and relative population fitness. Overall, we found a strong, positive relationship between genetic variation, hybridization, and transplant fitness, emphasizing the importance of genetic variation and population mixing in conservation.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere13049
JournalConservation Letters
Volume17
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2024

Keywords

  • conservation
  • fitness
  • genetic variation
  • heterosis
  • hybridization
  • reintroduction
  • translocation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Genetic variation and hybridization determine the outcomes of conservation reintroductions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this