Greater stem growth, woody allocation, and aboveground biomass in Paleotropical forests than in Neotropical forests

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Forest dynamics and tree species composition vary substantially between Paleotropical and Neotropical forests, but these broad biogeographic regions are treated uniformly in many land models. To assess whether these regional differences translate into variation in productivity and carbon (C) storage, we compiled a database of climate, tree stem growth, litterfall, aboveground net primary production (ANPP), and aboveground biomass across tropical rainforest sites spanning 33 countries throughout Central and South America, Asia, and Australasia, but excluding Africa due to a paucity of available data. Though the sum of litterfall and stem growth (ANPP) did not differ between regions, both stem growth and the ratio of stem growth to litterfall were higher in Paleotropical forests compared to Neotropical forests across the full observed range of ANPP. Greater C allocation to woody growth likely explains the much larger aboveground biomass estimates in Paleotropical forests (~29%, or ~80 Mg DW/ha, greater than in the Neotropics). Climate was similar in Paleo- and Neotropical forests, thus the observed differences in C likely reflect differences in the evolutionary history of species and forest structure and function between regions. Our analysis suggests that Paleotropical forests, which can be dominated by tall-statured Dipterocarpaceae species, may be disproportionate hotspots for aboveground C storage. Land models typically treat these distinct tropical forests with differential structures as a single functional unit, but our findings suggest that this may overlook critical biogeographic variation in C storage potential among regions.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere02589
JournalEcology
Volume100
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2019

Funding

P. Taylor, C. Cleveland, W. Wieder, and A. Townsend designed the study. P. Taylor assembled the database, P. Taylor, W. Wieder, C. Cleveland, and S. Dobrowski analyzed the data, P. Taylor, F. Soper, and C. Cleveland wrote the paper, and all authors edited drafts and contributed to the revisions. This paper is a contribution from the Tropical Nutrient Limitation working group at the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS, funded by the National Science Foundation), the University of California, and the State of California. We acknowledge the staff of NCEAS for logistical and technical support. Financial support was provided by National Science Foundation (NSF) Grant DEB-0919080 to C. Cleveland and A. Townsend, and NSF DEB-1556643 to C. Cleveland, and NSF. W. Wieder was supported via funding from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (NIFA 2015-67003-23485) and a NASA Interdisciplinary Science Program award (NNX17AK19G).

FundersFunder number
NNX17AK19G, NIFA 2015-67003-23485
California State University Stanislaus
DEB-0919080, DEB-1556643

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
      SDG 13 Climate Action
    2. SDG 15 - Life on Land
      SDG 15 Life on Land

    Keywords

    • Amazon Basin
    • biomass
    • carbon allocation
    • carbon cycle
    • climate
    • net primary production
    • southeast Asia
    • synthesis
    • tropical rainforest

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Greater stem growth, woody allocation, and aboveground biomass in Paleotropical forests than in Neotropical forests'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this