Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Guiding principles for rewilding

  • Steve Carver
  • , Ian Convery
  • , Sally Hawkins
  • , Rene Beyers
  • , Adam Eagle
  • , Zoltan Kun
  • , Erwin Van Maanen
  • , Yue Cao
  • , Mark Fisher
  • , Stephen R. Edwards
  • , Cara Nelson
  • , George D. Gann
  • , Steve Shurter
  • , Karina Aguilar
  • , Angela Andrade
  • , William J. Ripple
  • , John Davis
  • , Anthony Sinclair
  • , Marc Bekoff
  • , Reed Noss
  • Dave Foreman, Hanna Pettersson, Meredith Root-Bernstein, Jens Christian Svenning, Peter Taylor, Sophie Wynne-Jones, Alan Watson Featherstone, Camilla Fløjgaard, Mark Stanley-Price, Laetitia M. Navarro, Toby Aykroyd, Alison Parfitt, Michael Soulé
  • University of Leeds
  • University of Cumbria
  • University of British Columbia
  • The Lifescape Project
  • Wild Europe
  • Rewilding Foundation
  • Tsinghua University
  • International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources
  • The Institute for Regional Conservation
  • Society for Ecological Restoration
  • White Oak Conservation
  • Agencia Metropolitana de Bosques Urbanos del AMG
  • Conservation International Colombia
  • Oregon State University
  • The Rewilding Institute
  • University of Colorado Boulder
  • Florida Institute for Conservation Science
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
  • Universidad de Chile
  • Aarhus University
  • Bangor University
  • Freelance Ecologist
  • University of Oxford
  • German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig
  • Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
  • Wild Europe
  • Society for Conservation Biology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

222 Scopus citations

Abstract

There has been much recent interest in the concept of rewilding as a tool for nature conservation, but also confusion over the idea, which has limited its utility. We developed a unifying definition and 10 guiding principles for rewilding through a survey of 59 rewilding experts, a summary of key organizations’ rewilding visions, and workshops involving over 100 participants from around the world. The guiding principles convey that rewilding exits on a continuum of scale, connectivity, and level of human influence and aims to restore ecosystem structure and functions to achieve a self-sustaining autonomous nature. These principles clarify the concept of rewilding and improve its effectiveness as a tool to achieve global conservation targets, including those of the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration and post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. Finally, we suggest differences in rewilding perspectives lie largely in the extent to which it is seen as achievable and in specific interventions. An understanding of the context of rewilding projects is the key to success, and careful site-specific interpretations will help achieve the aims of rewilding.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1882-1893
Number of pages12
JournalConservation Biology
Volume35
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2021

Funding

We acknowledge the support of the IUCN CEM and those rewilding pioneers and experts who responded to the survey, took part in workshops, or both. We also acknowledge the helpful comments of the reviewers and journal editors. We dedicate this paper to the memory of Michael Soulé and Alison Parfitt. In their own ways they both contributed greatly to conservation science and the preparation of this article. We cherish their friendship and mourn their passing.

    Keywords

    • definition
    • ecosystem management
    • goals
    • guiding principles
    • rewilding

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Guiding principles for rewilding'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this