TY - JOUR
T1 - Harvest demographics of temperate-breeding Canada geese in South Dakota, 1967-1995
AU - Gleason, Jeffrey S.
AU - Jenks, Jonathan A.
AU - Naugle, David E.
AU - Mammenga, Paul W.
AU - Vaa, Spencer J.
AU - Pritchett, J. M.Jennifer M.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank P. Geissler and B. H. Powell of the U.S. Geological Survey. Canada Geese were banded under Permit #06897 issued to the South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks. We recognize state and federal personnel and the numerous volunteers for their efforts during annual Canada goose banding operations and numerous private landowners who participated in the early Canada goose restoration efforts. F. Quamen, B. Schulz, and T. Sanders assisted with preparation of this manuscript. We thank J. Schmutz and 2 anonymous reviewers for commenting on a previous version of this manuscript. This manuscript benefitted from reviews by M. Conover and 2 anonymous reviewers. Funding for this project was provided by the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Program, Project W-75-R, No. 7569 through the South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks. Support was provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Geological Survey, South Dakota State University, and the Wildlife Management Institute. Any mention of trade names is purely coincidental and does not represent endorsement by the funding agencies or the government. The findings and conclusions in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - In South Dakota, breeding giant Canada geese (Branta canadensis maxima) have increased substantially, and harvest management strategies have been implemented to maximize hunting opportunity (e.g., special early-September seasons) on local, as well as molt-migrant giant Canada geese (B. c. interior) while still protecting lesser abundant Arcticbreeding Canada geese and cackling geese (e.g., B. hutchinsii, B. minima). Information on important parameters, such as survival and recovery rates, are generally lacking for giant Canada geese in the northern Great Plains. Patterns in Canada goose band recoveries can provide insight into the distribution, chronology, and harvest pressures to which a given goose population segment is exposed. We studied spatial and temporal recovery patterns of molting Canada geese during annual banding efforts in South Dakota between 1967 and 1995. Recovery rates (% ± SE) for Canada geese increased over time in both western South Dakota (0.034 ± 0.005 [1967 to 1976], 0.056 ± 0.009 [1977 to 1986]) and eastern (0.026 ± 0.002 [1967 to 1978], 0.058 ± 0.003 [1987 to 1995]) South Dakota. Although recovery rates for Canada geese west of the Missouri River (WR) and east of the Missouri River (ER) were relatively similar, recovery distribution and harvest chronology indicate spatial and temporal differences for geese banded in these 2 geographic regions. Overall, Canada geese banded in South Dakota were recovered in 23 states and 5 Canadian provinces, and recovery distribution varied relative to banding region. Distribution of recoveries suggests a south-southwesterly movement for WR-banded geese compared to a south-southeasterly movement for ERbanded geese. For WR-banded geese, 40 to 52% and 30 to 34% of direct and indirect recoveries, respectively, occurred in December. In contrast, for ER-banded geese, 19 to 38% and 15 to 19% of direct and indirect recoveries, respectively, occurred in December. Waterfowl managers need to consider that recovery rates and harvest chronology of banded giant Canada geese may vary geographically within a state or province. Refinement of harvest management strategies at multiple spatial scales may be required.
AB - In South Dakota, breeding giant Canada geese (Branta canadensis maxima) have increased substantially, and harvest management strategies have been implemented to maximize hunting opportunity (e.g., special early-September seasons) on local, as well as molt-migrant giant Canada geese (B. c. interior) while still protecting lesser abundant Arcticbreeding Canada geese and cackling geese (e.g., B. hutchinsii, B. minima). Information on important parameters, such as survival and recovery rates, are generally lacking for giant Canada geese in the northern Great Plains. Patterns in Canada goose band recoveries can provide insight into the distribution, chronology, and harvest pressures to which a given goose population segment is exposed. We studied spatial and temporal recovery patterns of molting Canada geese during annual banding efforts in South Dakota between 1967 and 1995. Recovery rates (% ± SE) for Canada geese increased over time in both western South Dakota (0.034 ± 0.005 [1967 to 1976], 0.056 ± 0.009 [1977 to 1986]) and eastern (0.026 ± 0.002 [1967 to 1978], 0.058 ± 0.003 [1987 to 1995]) South Dakota. Although recovery rates for Canada geese west of the Missouri River (WR) and east of the Missouri River (ER) were relatively similar, recovery distribution and harvest chronology indicate spatial and temporal differences for geese banded in these 2 geographic regions. Overall, Canada geese banded in South Dakota were recovered in 23 states and 5 Canadian provinces, and recovery distribution varied relative to banding region. Distribution of recoveries suggests a south-southwesterly movement for WR-banded geese compared to a south-southeasterly movement for ERbanded geese. For WR-banded geese, 40 to 52% and 30 to 34% of direct and indirect recoveries, respectively, occurred in December. In contrast, for ER-banded geese, 19 to 38% and 15 to 19% of direct and indirect recoveries, respectively, occurred in December. Waterfowl managers need to consider that recovery rates and harvest chronology of banded giant Canada geese may vary geographically within a state or province. Refinement of harvest management strategies at multiple spatial scales may be required.
KW - Branta canadensis maxima
KW - Canada geese
KW - Distribution
KW - Harvest chronology
KW - Human-wildlife conflicts
KW - Recoveries
KW - Recovery rate
KW - South dakota
KW - Status
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928689291&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84928689291
SN - 2155-3858
VL - 9
SP - 14
EP - 35
JO - Human-Wildlife Interactions
JF - Human-Wildlife Interactions
IS - 1
ER -