Abstract
This paper reports an experiment that investigates how feedback about co-worker's performance and anonymity affect a team member's performance in an idea generation task conducted asynchronously. The results indicated that there was no main effect of anonymity: anonymity by itself did not affect group performance. Receiving information about co-worker's performance increased group performance; however, the perceived level of co-worker's performance did not affect group performance. Participants who perceived that their co-workers had high performance experienced significantly more social comparison with identified input than with anonymous input. However, this motivation gain did not translate into a performance gain. Implications of these results and future research are discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 652-659 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | International Journal of Information Management |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2014 |
Keywords
- asynchronous collaboration virtual team social loafing social comparison
- Virtual collaboration