TY - JOUR
T1 - “I am empowered by this opportunity”
T2 - The role of abortion funds as an antidote to abortion stigma
AU - Garnsey, Al
AU - Liddell, Jessica L.
AU - Glover, Annie
AU - Doria, Celina M.
AU - Buscaglia, Alex
AU - Buxbaum, Lauren
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Beyond the many structural obstacles to obtaining abortion care in the United States, abortion stigma is a forceful impediment to accessing timely services and an injurious feature of the experience for some people who have abortions (Sorhaindo & Lavelanet, 2022). This study utilized a qualitative methodology to explore the experiences of 830 abortion fund applicants in the Rocky Mountain Region to better understand the unique barriers they face in accessing care, the role that stigma plays in influencing applications for abortion fund support, and inform strategies to expand support infrastructure for those facing isolation and hostility in their pursuit of care. For the applicants in this study, stigma was frequently cited as an impetus for seeking abortion fund support and a burdensome aspect of the experience itself. Stigma—whether internalized, perceived, enacted, or structural—prevented many applicants from seeking material or emotional support from their social networks and spurred the dissolution of interpersonal relationships—with far-reaching emotional and material consequences. The results suggest that abortion funds go far beyond merely providing material support, also acting as an antidote to the harms associated with abortion stigma by promoting feelings of interconnectedness and mutuality among applicants. While accounts of stigma were pervasive in the applications, so, too, were the myriad strategies of resistance that applicants called upon to challenge stigmatizing narratives and position their choice to have an abortion as both moral and necessary.
AB - Beyond the many structural obstacles to obtaining abortion care in the United States, abortion stigma is a forceful impediment to accessing timely services and an injurious feature of the experience for some people who have abortions (Sorhaindo & Lavelanet, 2022). This study utilized a qualitative methodology to explore the experiences of 830 abortion fund applicants in the Rocky Mountain Region to better understand the unique barriers they face in accessing care, the role that stigma plays in influencing applications for abortion fund support, and inform strategies to expand support infrastructure for those facing isolation and hostility in their pursuit of care. For the applicants in this study, stigma was frequently cited as an impetus for seeking abortion fund support and a burdensome aspect of the experience itself. Stigma—whether internalized, perceived, enacted, or structural—prevented many applicants from seeking material or emotional support from their social networks and spurred the dissolution of interpersonal relationships—with far-reaching emotional and material consequences. The results suggest that abortion funds go far beyond merely providing material support, also acting as an antidote to the harms associated with abortion stigma by promoting feelings of interconnectedness and mutuality among applicants. While accounts of stigma were pervasive in the applications, so, too, were the myriad strategies of resistance that applicants called upon to challenge stigmatizing narratives and position their choice to have an abortion as both moral and necessary.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203662404&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100478
DO - 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100478
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85203662404
SN - 2667-3215
VL - 6
JO - SSM - Qualitative Research in Health
JF - SSM - Qualitative Research in Health
M1 - 100478
ER -