Abstract
The escalating climate and wildfire crises have generated worldwide interest in using proactive forest management (e.g. forest thinning, prescribed fire, cultural burning) to mitigate the risk of wildfire-caused carbon loss in forests. To estimate the risk of wildfire-caused carbon loss in western United States (US) conifer forests, we used a generalizable framework to evaluate interactions among wildfire hazard and carbon exposure and vulnerability. By evaluating where high social adaptive capacity for proactive forest management overlaps with carbon most vulnerable to wildfire-caused carbon loss, we identified opportunity hot spots for reducing the risk of wildfire-caused carbon loss. We found that relative to their total forest area, California, New Mexico, and Arizona contained the greatest proportion of carbon highly vulnerable to wildfire-caused loss. We also observed widespread opportunities in the western US for using proactive forest management to reduce the risk of wildfire-caused carbon loss, with many areas containing opportunities for simultaneously mitigating the greatest risk from wildfire to carbon and human communities. Finally, we highlighted collaborative and equitable processes that provide pathways to achieving timely climate- and wildfire-mitigation goals at opportunity hot spots.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 094040 |
| Journal | Environmental Research Letters |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 1 2023 |
Funding
We thank Kimberly Hall for contributing to the project’s literature review. J L P was supported by The Nature Conservancy NatureNet Science Fellowship and the Department of the Interior’s North Central Climate Adaptation Science Center through Cooperative Agreement G18AC00325 from the United States Geological Survey. PEH was supported by the Department of the Interior North Central Climate Adaptation Science Center through Cooperative Agreement G18AC00325 from the United States Geological Survey. KTD and KLR were supported by the Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory of the Rocky Mountain Research Station. L M, K L M, T W, M D R, R D H, J E F, R N A, S B, K B, M J C, T B C, E S, R S, and N W were supported by The Nature Conservancy. The authors have confirmed that any identifiable participants in this study have given their consent for publication.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| G18AC00325 | |
| K L M | |
| R-Biopharm AG | |
Keywords
- carbon
- conifer forest
- coupled human and natural systems
- risk
- vulnerability
- wildfire