TY - JOUR
T1 - Institutional Responses to Campus Sexual Assault
T2 - Examining the Development and Work of A Multidisciplinary Team
AU - Olomi, Julie M.
AU - DePrince, Anne P.
AU - Gagnon, Kerry L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 Taylor & Francis.
PY - 2019/5/27
Y1 - 2019/5/27
N2 - Responding to campus sexual assault can involve complex processes and procedures that span campus, criminal justice, and community-based institutions, particularly when there are co-occurring Title IX and criminal investigations. This study investigated the development of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) that involved campus, criminal justice, and community-based institutions seeking to improve coordinated responses to campus sexual assault. Data included observations of MDT monthly meetings over 16 months as well as individual interviews with MDT members. Transcripts of the MDT meetings and individual interviews were coded to capture major themes. The MDT meetings were dynamic and flexible with a structure that involved intentional agenda setting along with responsiveness to current events and collaborative processes. The MDT invested more time during the meetings addressing the complexity of navigating existing procedures than developing new protocols. Individual interviews with MDT members highlighted logistical challenges that were relevant to MDT effectiveness, such as consistent attendance, supervisor legitimacy, and differences in stakeholder priorities. Implications for future MDT work are discussed.
AB - Responding to campus sexual assault can involve complex processes and procedures that span campus, criminal justice, and community-based institutions, particularly when there are co-occurring Title IX and criminal investigations. This study investigated the development of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) that involved campus, criminal justice, and community-based institutions seeking to improve coordinated responses to campus sexual assault. Data included observations of MDT monthly meetings over 16 months as well as individual interviews with MDT members. Transcripts of the MDT meetings and individual interviews were coded to capture major themes. The MDT meetings were dynamic and flexible with a structure that involved intentional agenda setting along with responsiveness to current events and collaborative processes. The MDT invested more time during the meetings addressing the complexity of navigating existing procedures than developing new protocols. Individual interviews with MDT members highlighted logistical challenges that were relevant to MDT effectiveness, such as consistent attendance, supervisor legitimacy, and differences in stakeholder priorities. Implications for future MDT work are discussed.
KW - Sexual assault
KW - campus sexual assault
KW - multidisciplinary team (MDT)
KW - title IX
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065712699&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15299732.2019.1571886
DO - 10.1080/15299732.2019.1571886
M3 - Article
C2 - 31072271
AN - SCOPUS:85065712699
SN - 1529-9732
VL - 20
SP - 324
EP - 339
JO - Journal of Trauma and Dissociation
JF - Journal of Trauma and Dissociation
IS - 3
ER -