Isopods failed to acclimate their thermal sensitivity of locomotor performance during predictable or stochastic cooling

Matthew S. Schuler, Brandon S. Cooper, Jonathan J. Storm, Michael W. Sears, Michael J. Angilletta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

Most organisms experience environments that vary continuously over time, yet researchers generally study phenotypic responses to abrupt and sustained changes in environmental conditions. Gradual environmental changes, whether predictable or stochastic, might affect organisms differently than do abrupt changes. To explore this possibility, we exposed terrestrial isopods (Porcellio scaber) collected from a highly seasonal environment to four thermal treatments: (1) a constant 20°C; (2) a constant 10°C; (3) a steady decline from 20° to 10°C; and (4) a stochastic decline from 20° to 10°C that mimicked natural conditions during autumn. After 45 days, we measured thermal sensitivities of running speed and thermal tolerances (critical thermal maximum and chill-coma recovery time). Contrary to our expectation, thermal treatments did not affect the thermal sensitivity of locomotion; isopods from all treatments ran fastest at 33° to 34°C and achieved more than 80% of their maximal speed over a range of 10° to 11°C. Isopods exposed to a stochastic decline in temperature tolerated cold the best, and isopods exposed to a constant temperature of 20°C tolerated cold the worst. No significant variation in heat tolerance was observed among groups. Therefore, thermal sensitivity and heat tolerance failed to acclimate to any type of thermal change, whereas cold tolerance acclimated more during stochastic change than it did during abrupt change.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere20905
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume6
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Isopods failed to acclimate their thermal sensitivity of locomotor performance during predictable or stochastic cooling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this