TY - GEN
T1 - Key considerations for robust near-field response prediction and optical metasurface inverse design
AU - Mick, Ethan J.
AU - Lindsay, Marshall B.
AU - Kovaleski, Scott D.
AU - Anderson, Derek T.
AU - Lahrichi, Saad
AU - Malof, Jordan
AU - Price, Steven R.
AU - Price, Stanton R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© COPYRIGHT SPIE. Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Optical metasurfaces, used in applications such as signature management and wavefront sculpting, are increasingly leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) for inverse design. The objective is to significantly accelerate the discovery of innovative solutions, moving beyond traditional, slow, and inefficient simulation-based methods or reliance on human intuition. In this article, various AI-driven approaches are examined for learning a robust forward prediction emulator, a key step in inverse design. Despite their potential, challenges remain, including issues with accuracy, generalization, and the need for unrealistic amounts of data. The networks are compared and contrasted, ranging from direct models that map design parameters to waves to sequence-based approaches that aim to learn incremental wave propagation. Using a dataset generated in MEEP, best practices are sought regarding network architecture, optimization, penalization, evaluation criteria, and experimental design. Ultimately, these details and insights are intended to enhance research reproducibility, address the practical implementation of these networks, and offer recommendations for future AI solutions.
AB - Optical metasurfaces, used in applications such as signature management and wavefront sculpting, are increasingly leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) for inverse design. The objective is to significantly accelerate the discovery of innovative solutions, moving beyond traditional, slow, and inefficient simulation-based methods or reliance on human intuition. In this article, various AI-driven approaches are examined for learning a robust forward prediction emulator, a key step in inverse design. Despite their potential, challenges remain, including issues with accuracy, generalization, and the need for unrealistic amounts of data. The networks are compared and contrasted, ranging from direct models that map design parameters to waves to sequence-based approaches that aim to learn incremental wave propagation. Using a dataset generated in MEEP, best practices are sought regarding network architecture, optimization, penalization, evaluation criteria, and experimental design. Ultimately, these details and insights are intended to enhance research reproducibility, address the practical implementation of these networks, and offer recommendations for future AI solutions.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105008495148
U2 - 10.1117/12.3053481
DO - 10.1117/12.3053481
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105008495148
T3 - Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
BT - Advanced Optics for Imaging Applications
A2 - Vizgaitis, Jay N.
A2 - Marasco, Peter L.
A2 - Sanghera, Jasbinder S.
PB - SPIE
T2 - Advanced Optics for Imaging Applications: UV through LWIR X 2025
Y2 - 14 April 2025 through 15 April 2025
ER -